SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 586

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, SHANTANU KEMKAR
Bhaiyalal Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
K.P. Mishra with Vibhudhendra Mishra for appellant.

JUDGMENT

Raveendran, C.J. -- An order dated 18.11.2003 was passed against the appellant Employer under section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act' for short) directing him to deposit certain amounts due in respect of the period from April, 1993 to September, 1999, Feeling aggrieved, the appellant filed a petition for review of the said order under section 7B of the Act. The said review petition was rejected. When the review petition was rejected, the appellant challenged the original order dated 18.11.2003 in W.P. No. 2457/2004.


The learned Single Judge has dismissed the said petition by order dated 2.7.2004 on the ground that an efficacious alternative remedy by way of appeal is available under section 71 of the Act. The said rejection is challenged in this appeal.


Learned counsel for the appellant relied on section 7 B (5) of the Act to contend that the remedy by way of an appeal is not available to him against the original order once a review petition filed against the original order is rejected and that the writ petition ought not to have been rejected on the ground of availability of an alt













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top