SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 30

S.C.VYAS
Gurmeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Jaisingh with Vivek Singh for applicant; Ajay Kakani, Government Advocate for State.

ORDER

1. Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 2.3.2005, passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Indore in Criminal Case No. 864 of 04, whereby the application filed by applicant accused under section 177 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been rejected, hence applicant preferred this revision before this Court.

2. Facts of the prosecution case in short are that complainant Ramnik Kaur who is resident of Ranchi (Jharkhand) was married to the applicant on 28.5.200 I. The marriage of Ramnik Kaur was solemnized with applicant Gurmeet Singh on 28.5.200 I at Patna. The applicant is permanent resident of S.P. Mukherjee Road, Murgasal. Asansole, District Vardhaman (W.B.). After the marriage she had started living with her husband, mother- in-law Surjeet Kaur, sister in law Ravindra Kaur and Balvinder Kaur at Asansole. She had lodged a first information report at Mahila Police Station, Indore on 2.8.2004 in which it has been alleged that just from the second day of the marriage her husband Gurmeet Singh, her mother in law Surjeet Kaur, sister in law Ravindra Kaur and Balvinder Kaur started treating her with cruelty and demanded a Santro Car and Rs. 50.000/-. They have started beat















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top