Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Vijay Kumar Shukla
Rajkumar Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State Of M.P. Through Commercial Tax Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. timeline of events leading to the petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. arguments regarding delay in proceedings. (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. court's reasoning on procedural issues. (Para 10 , 18 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. legal precedent on promotion despite misconduct. (Para 17 , 22) |
| 5. court's view on operational abuse of powers. (Para 19) |
| 6. conclusion and order for relief and payment. (Para 23 , 24) |
ORDER :
Vijay Kumar Shukla, J.
The present petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashment of the show cause notice dated 21.10.2011 and also the charge sheet dated 13.07.2016 issued by the respondent no.1 and also prayed for a direction to release the retiral dues of the petitioner.
2. That petitioner was initially appointed as Sales Tax Officer through the examination conducted by the Respondent No. 3. Thereafter, he has been promoted to the post of Assistant Commissioner and worked from 11.05.1999 to 29.07.2006 at the Zonal Office-2, Indore.
3. On 21.10.2011, respondents issued a Show Cause Notice to the petitioner stating, why three annual increment with cumulative effect should not be stopped. The aforesaid show cause notice
Prolonged delays in disciplinary proceedings can undermine their validity, especially if an employee has been promoted despite alleged misconduct.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the quashing of the charge-sheet and show-cause-notice due to gross delay in initiation of proceedings by the concerned respondents, which caused m....
Protracted disciplinary proceedings without valid justification, especially post-acquittal in criminal cases, constitute harassment and must be quashed.
The requirement of valid sanction, limitation on initiating action after retirement, and the necessity of specific charges for fair opportunity for defense.
Mistakes in implementation of disciplinary proceedings do not invalidate findings against impersonation if the misconduct is substantiated. Delays in proceedings, while regrettable, do not excuse fra....
Prolonged disciplinary proceedings against retired employees without justification can lead to quashing of the proceedings, emphasizing the need for timely action.
Long delays in disciplinary proceedings can lead to their quashing, especially when the charged employee is not at fault, violating principles of administrative justice.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
