Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, Anuradha Shukla
Parasia Engineering Pvt.Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the arbitration revision (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding limitation and compliance (Para 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's observations on the tribunal's jurisdiction and compliance with contractual clauses (Para 4 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 21 , 24) |
| 4. legal reasoning determining the non-compliance with requirements (Para 18 , 20 , 23 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. ratio decidendi on contestable timelines in resolutions. (Para 22) |
| 6. final dismissal of the revision petition (Para 27) |
ORDER :
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
This Arbitration Revision under Section 19 of the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 (for short, ‘the Adhiniyam’) has been filed assailing order dated 09.02.2023 passed in Reference Case No.25/2009 by learned M.P. Arbitration Tribunal, Bhopal (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) whereby the revision filed before the Tribunal has been dismissed as not maintainable on the ground of limitation holding that the petitioner has not filed the petition in compliance with the provision of Section 7 -B(1)(b) of the Adhiniyam as he has failed to approach the final authority within the stipulated time as per the term
Compliance with dispute resolution timelines in contracts is mandatory, and failure to adhere renders arbitration petitions non-maintainable under specified legal frameworks.
A procedural failure of the Superintending Engineer does not negate a petitioner's entitlement to appeal, provided the requisite timelines for reference and appeals are respected.
The limitation period for arbitration references under the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam commences from the communication of the Dispute Board's decision, and the petitioner filed within this ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adhering to the terms of the contract, including the dispute resolution mechanism, and the court's limited revisional powers in i....
Parties must exhaust contractual dispute resolution mechanisms, but such compliance cannot obstruct access to justice, especially when limitation periods are extended due to exceptional circumstances....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
