IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Nikhil Rastogi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. marriage and initial context of dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on fir's validity. (Para 5) |
| 3. court's analysis of previous decision. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. principles regarding quashing fir. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. guidelines on quashing proceedings. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. observations on paras. (Para 23) |
| 7. scope of judicial interference under cr.p.c. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. conclusion on merit of quashing request. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 9. dismissal of the petition. (Para 32 , 33) |
ORDER :
VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA, J.
The present petition is filed under section 482 of Cr.P.C for quashment of FIR No.148/2022 registered at police station Vijay Nagar, Indore under section 420, 406, 498-A of IPC and 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and criminal proceedings instituted by the respondent no.2 against the petitioner vide RCT No.1809/2023 pending before the JMFC, Indore.
2. In the year 2017, the marriage was performed between the petitioner and respondent no.2 as per Indian customs and traditions in New Delhi, India. After the solemnization of marriage on 25.11.2017, the complainant and the petitioner stayed at the petitioners' fathe
Munshiram v. State of Rajasthan
Teeja Devi v. State of Rajasthan
State of Orissa v. Ujjal Kumar Burdhan
Supreme Court in the case of XYZ v. State of Gujarat
S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal reported
Sangeeta Agrawal v. State of U.P.
Ajay Kumar Das v. State of Jharkhand
Mohd. Akram Siddiqui v. State of Bihar
State of A.P. v. Gourishetty Mahesh
M. Srikanth v. State of Telangana
Inherent powers under Section 482 of CrPC should be exercised sparingly to prevent misuse of criminal law, quashing only when FIR doesn't disclose an offence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for proper investigation and the cautious exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of CrPC. The Court emphasized that interfere....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the inherent power under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code should be sparingly used and only in exceptional cases to prevent abuse of....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a prima facie case to be made out against the accused and the limitations on the court's power to appreciate evidence at the pr....
The High Court can quash non-compoundable offences under Section 482 when the parties amicably settle their dispute and continuation of proceedings would cause extreme injustice.
Dowry offences – Criminal case cannot proceed on general and omnibus allegations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.