Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VISHAL DHAGAT
Nagrik Upbhokta Margdarshak Manch – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (old Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure) challenging order dated 25.08.2014 passed in Criminal Revision No. 160/2006 by Additional Judge to the Court of 1st Additional Session Judge, Tikamgarh, by which order passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Tikamgarh dated 22.06.2006 was upheld and revision was dismissed.
2. Brief facts of the case is that a complaint is filed by one Nirmal Lohia, who is President of Nagrik Upbhokta Margdarshak Manch, Tikamgarh, against Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Assistant Engineer, Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Mandal, Tikamgarh and R.N. Mishra, Secretary, Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Mandal, Shakti Nagar, Rampur, Jabalpur. It was stated in complaint that Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 was made effective from 04.09.1985. Exercising power under Section 72 of said Act, Government of Madhya Pradesh has enacted Madhya Pradesh Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Rules, 1989. Said Rules were brought into effect from 09.02.1989. It is submitted that as per said Rules, there has to be periodical verification of weights and
The absence of prescribed units for electricity in the relevant rules prohibits mandatory verification of electricity meters, thus justifying dismissal of cognizance.
Point of law : Police Officer cannot submit a report under Section 173 of Cr.P.C. in regard to an offence under Section 32 of the Drugs and Cosmetics ActA police officer is not specially trained to i....
Prosecution for violations of the Legal Metrology Act is unwarranted if the packaging complies with the standards of legibility and prominence.
The legal principle establishes that the question of manipulation of an electronic balance must be determined through trial, not through a pre-trial quashing.
The specific roles and responsibilities of individuals within a company must be clearly established to hold them liable for violations under the SWM rules.
The authority to conduct searches and seizures must be legally conferred; actions taken without such authority are invalid.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
