Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI
State of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Gandhinagar Grah Nirman Sahakari Sanstha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. commonality in contested lands. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background on property disputes. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. history of litigation over property. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. arguments presented by appellants. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. judicial observations on compliance. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 18) |
| 6. no substantial question of law exists. (Para 19 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. dismissal of appeals due to lack of merit. (Para 20 , 21 , 24 , 26) |
| 8. applications related to impleadment denied. (Para 27 , 28) |
JUDGMENT :
BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. Having regard to the similitude of controversy involved, commonality of disputed lands and parties, these second appeals are being disposed of by this common order.
2. Appellant State of Madhya Pradesh and others and Bhagwan Bahubali Digamber Trust (For short hereinafter will referred as ‘Trust’) have filed these appeals against the Judgment and Decree dated 16-10-2019 passed by the Learned XXVIIth Additional District Judge Indore in Civil Regular Appeal No. 240/2017, whereby the Judgment and Decree passed by the Trial Court dismissing the Civil suit No 109-A/2016 (Earlier No 114-A/1986) filed by the Respondent No.1 Shri Gandhi Nagar Grih Nirman Sahakari Sanstha (for
Appellate courts must respect trial court findings unless there is a substantial question of law or a material irregularity; mere disagreements on facts are insufficient for overturning decisions.
The settlement order, revenue records, and lack of evidence supporting adverse possession claims were crucial in establishing the plaintiffs' continuous possession and defeating the defendants' claim....
Concurrent findings of fact by the Trial Court and First Appellate Court are binding and cannot be interfered with under Section 100 of the CPC.
The principle of res judicata applies where previous judgments on the same issue bind parties, regardless of claims involving part of the land. Judicial findings must reflect conscious application to....
The right to withdraw a suit at the appellate stage is not absolute; it depends on the crystallized rights established by the court's earlier judgments.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
