2024 Supreme(Bom) 25
MANGESH S. PATIL, S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Ikba S/o Chandulal Shaikh – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Sachin S. Panale, K.N. Shermale.
For the Respondents: A.S. Shinde, M.P. Kale.
JUDGMENT :
MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
1. We have heard the learned advocates and the learned A.P.P. in all these matters.
2. Following question has been referred to us for determination:
“Whether in the absence of a Rule regulating the procedure framed by the High Court for admission or listing the Revision without surrender, the High Court under revisional jurisdiction under Section 397 [Calling for records to exercise powers of revision: (1) The High Court or any Sessions Judge may call for and examine the record of any proceeding before any inferior Criminal Court situate within its or his local jurisdiction for the purpose of satisfying itself or himself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of any finding, sentence or order, recorded or passed, and as to the regularity of any proceedings of such inferior Court, and may, when calling for such record, direct that the execution of any sentence or order be suspended, and if the accused is in confinement, that he be released on bail or on his own bond pending the examination of the record. Explanation - All Magistrates, whether Executive or Judicial, and whether exercising original or appellate jurisdiction, shall be deemed to be infe
Click Here to Read the rest of this document