Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR
AMIT SETH
Murli Manohar Debauliya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to resolution and cancellation of appointment (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's appointment process and authority (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. opposition from state on appointment and jurisdiction (Para 4) |
ORDER :
AMIT SETH, J.
The instant writ petition takes exception to the resolution dated 14.04.2023 (Annexure-P/11) passed by the Gram Panchayat Mohanpura, Janpad Panchayat Seondha, District Datia (M.P.). The petition also challenges the order dated 10.04.2023 (Annexure-P/15) passed by the respondent No.3, whereby, on the representation/resolution of the Gram Panchayat, the earlier order dated 16.02.2023 passed by respondent No.3, appointing the petitioner as Pujari of the temple Shri Bhagwan Shankar Va Vankhandeshwar Ji, Gram Mohanpura and Teda Mandir, Tehsil Seondha, has been recalled and cancelled.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the application (Annexure-P/1) dated 17.04.2023 submitted by the petitioner, and on receiving the report from the Patwari (Annexure-P/2), and on being satisfied that the petitioner was eligible to be appointed as Pujari of the temple in question, the respondent No.3 passed an order dated 16.02.2023, whereby th
The authority to appoint includes the authority to rescind, and the failure to establish prejudice resulting from not following natural justice does not invalidate the cancellation of an appointment.
The appointment of an authorized controller under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act must adhere to principles of natural justice, requiring the decision-maker to provide a fair hearing and avoid bi....
Amended S.55 TN HR&CE Act abolishes hereditary pujari rights; civil declaration unavailable.
Point of Law : Court need not issue a writ merely because there is violation of the natural justice, not because it is not necessary to observe natural justice but because Courts do not issue futile ....
A pujari's role does not confer ownership rights over temple property, which vests in the deity and is managed by the State.
Natural justice principles must be upheld in administrative actions, particularly in temple management disputes.
Point of Law : Appellants being covered by the phrase "parties concerned" as used by the learned Single Judge have full rights to appear before the said authority and furnish all its documents and ev....
The court upheld the appointment of a fit person for temple administration, emphasizing that prior claims by the petitioner were withdrawn, negating his right to contest the appointment without a hea....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
