Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR
Ashish Shroti
Archana Jain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges authority concerning principal's appointment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. discussion on petitioner's eligibility and past penalties. (Para 8 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court examines the authority of involved officials. (Para 9 , 11 , 15) |
| 4. guidance on authority structure and necessity for fresh orders. (Para 16 , 19 , 20 , 22) |
| 5. court orders fresh order within a specified timeframe. (Para 23) |
Ashish Shroti, J.
1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 27/02/2025 (Annexure- P/1), whereby respondent no.3 has directed handing over of current charge of the post of Principal of the college to respondent no.5.
2. The facts necessary for decision of this case are that the petitioner is working as Assistant Professor (Economics) in S.S.L. Jain P.G. College, Vidisha (M.P.) which is aided by the State Government. One Dr. (Smt.) Shobha Jain was working as in-charge Principal of this college and was due to retire w.e.f. 28/02/2025. The Rajmata Vijaya Raje Scindia Girls P.G. College, Vidisha is the lead college in respect of S.S.L. Jain P.G. College, Vidisha (M.P.). In view of nearing retirement of Dr. (Smt.) Shobha Jain, respondent no.6 made rec
The court ruled that the authority to assign the Principal role resides with the Regional Additional Director, and orders issued without following proper protocols are invalid.
The Officiating Principal has the right to challenge the appointment of a regularly selected candidate, and appointments made contrary to statutory provisions are invalid.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Regulation 2(1) regarding the appointment process for the post of Principal and the legal obligation of the Management to ....
Transfer stipulations in employment determine seniority rights and must be respected in disputes regarding promotions.
The appointment of public officials must adhere to the prescribed procedures and consider all eligible candidates, as per the relevant service rules.
The court ruled that a writ petition lacks merit if the petitioner is no longer associated with the institution in question.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
