SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 570

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
PREM NARAYAN SINGH
Shaligram – Appellant
Versus
Ajay – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ashok Kumar Sethi, Harish Joshi
For the Respondent: Rishi Agrawal

JUDGMENT :

PREM NARAYAN SINGH, J.

1. With consent of both the parties, the appeal is heard at motion stage at admission.

2. This Second appeal under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code (for brevity, CPC) has been filed by the appellant against the impugned judgment and decree dated 11.12.2019 passed by the First Additional District Judge, Ratlam in Civil Appeal No.55/2019 confirming the Judgment and decree dated 02.07.2019 passed by Second Civil Judge, Class-II, Sailana, District Ratlam in Civil Suit No.26-A/2018.

3. The facts necessary for disposal of the present appeal in brief are that the appeal arises out of the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiffs for eviction in respect of the "suit house" which is situated at Karnataka Chouhara, Village Bajna, District Ratlam. It is pertinent to mention that the provisions of M.P. Accommodation Control Act are not applicable in village Bajna and therefore, the eviction was sought by taking recourse to the provisions of Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. The suit was filed by the respondent on the averment that the suit house was purchased by the respondent by a registered sale deed dated 05.03.2014. It was averred that the appellan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top