Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
PREM NARAYAN SINGH
Satyanarayan – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the petition details. (Para 1) |
| 2. contentions of the petitioners regarding land title. (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments by the respondents regarding land legality. (Para 3) |
| 4. initial consideration of the court. (Para 4) |
| 5. discussion on legal provisions and obligations of government lessees. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 6. precedents regarding bhumi swami rights and approval for land transfer. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 7. no rights to transfer land without proper authority. (Para 10) |
| 8. court's dismissal of the petition and suggestion for title suit. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER :
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners have filed the present petition filed under Section 227 of Constitution of India against the order dated 6.3.2018, passed in CRR No. 4132-2/2013.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the disputed land has been purchased by the petitioners from Respondent No. 4 Deepak by sale deed and thereafter the land was also mutated in favour of the petitioners. There is no violation of Section 165 or any other provision of MPLRC Act. However, in the year 2013, the Collector, Indore has issued notice with regard to respondent No.4. The mutation order has been taken in Suo Motu revisio
Land transfers by government lessees require prior approval from a Revenue Officer; transactions made without such consent are invalid.
The court concluded that the respondent lacked jurisdiction to revisit the validity of the sale deed during mutation proceedings, reaffirming that such matters should be handled by competent legal au....
The Additional Collector had jurisdiction to grant permission for land sale under Section 165(6) of the M. P. Land Revenue Code, 1959, and the High Court's interference was erroneous.
A landowner's right to mutate property based on a registered sale deed cannot be legally denied without lawful acquisition or evidence of ownership disputes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limitation period for exercising suo-motu revisional power and the validity of a sale deed executed without permission from the Collector.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
