IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR
ASHISH SHROTI, J.
Nirmal Singh Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 12832 of 2023
Decided On : 23-02-2026
Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 (M.P.) -- Rr. 2(d), 12, 13 and 14(21) -- jurisdiction -- departmental enquiry for misconduct -- Collector imposed major penalty -- appellate authority modified it into minor penalty on finding that Collector is empowered to impose only minor penalty -- legalized illegality committed by Collector -- such order of appellate authority unjustified and unreasonable for being passed without considering grounds of appeal -- moreover, non-supply of enquiry report to petitioner voilated principles of natural justice -- impugned orders unsustainable in law -- set aside -- matter remitted back to Collector to take steps afresh from stage of supply of copy of enquiry report to petitioner -- Collector competent only to issue charge-sheet in major penalty proceedings -- will transmit enquiry record to competent authority in case major punishment required. (1993) 4 SCC 727 followed. [Paras 16, 17, 20 & 21]
flfoy lsok ¼oxÊdj.k] fu;a=.k rFkk vihy½ fu;e] 1966 ¼e-ç-½ fu- 2¼Ä½] 12] 13 rFkk 14¼21½ & vfèkdkfjrk & vopkj d¢ fy, foÒkxh; tk¡p & dysDVj us xq: 'kkfLr vfèkj¨fir dh & vihy çkfèkdkjh us mls ;g fu"d"kZ fudkyrs gq, yÄq 'kkfLr esa mikarfjr fd;k fd dysDVj yÄq 'kkfLr vfèkj¨fir djus d¢ fy, gh l'kä gS & dysDVj }kjk dh xà voSèkrk d¨ oSèk cuk;k & vihy d¢ vkèkkj¨a ij fopkj fd, fcuk ikfjr fd, tkus d¢ dkj.k vihy çkfèkdkjh dk ;g vkns'k vuqfpr rFkk v;qfä;qä & bld¢ vfrfjä] ;kph d¨ tk¡p fji¨VZ çnk; ugÈ fd, tkus ls uSlfxZd U;k; d¢ fl)kar¨a dk vfrØe.k gqvk & vkf{kIr vkns'k fofèk esa fVdus ;¨X; ugÈ & vikLr & ;kph d¨ tk¡p fji¨VZ dh çfr çnk; djus d¢ çØe ls u, fljs ls dkjZokà fd, tkus d¢ fy, ekeyk dysDVj d¨ çfrçsf"kr & dysDVj xq: 'kkfLr dh dk;Zokgh esa d¢oy vkj¨ii= tkjh djus d¢ fy, l{ke & xq: naM visf{kr g¨us dh n'kk esa l{ke çkfèkdkjh dks tk¡p vfÒys[k ÒstsxkA ¼1993½ 4 ,llhlh 727 vuqlfjrA ¼iSjk 16] 17] 20 ,oa 21½
ORDER :
1. The petitioner has challenged order dated 20/12/2021 (Anneuxure-P/1), whereby the punishment of withholding four increments with cumulative effect was imposed on him by respondent no.3 on account of certain misconduct found proved in the departmental enquiry. He has also challenged order dated 02/05/2023 (Annexure-P/1), whereby his appeal was partly allowed by respondent no.2 and major punishment was substituted by a minor penalty of stoppage of two increments without cumulative effect. The petitioner also challenges the charge-sheet dated 20/03/2020 (Annexure-P/9) being without jurisdiction.
2. The facts necessary for decision of this case are that the petitioner was initially appointed as Assistant Teacher in respondent-Tribal Welfare Department. He was posted as Warden in Post-Matric Boys Hostel No.2, 3 & 4, Shriram Colony, Lashkar, Gwalior. He was thereafter, transferred and posted as Warden in Boys Hostel, Behat, Gwalior.
3. With regard to his working as warden in Post-Matric Boys Hostel No.2, 3 & 4, Shriram Colony, Lashkar, Gwalior, certain complaints of financial irregularities were noticed. A preliminary enquiry was conducted by a committee of six members who prima-facie found the allegations correct. Accordingly, the Collector- respondent no.3 issued a charge-sheet on 20/03/2020 thereby levelling three charges against the petitioner. Charges related to using the amount of scholarship towards maintenance and repairing of the hostel no.2, 3 & 4. It was, thus, alleged that he misused the official funds. The petitioner submitted reply to the charge-sheet on 24/07/2020 (Annexure-P/10) thereby denying the allegations. He stated in his reply that the repairing and maintenance work of hostel was carried out on account of complaints made by the students before the Chief Minister and the same was got done on oral instructions given from time to time by the Assistant Commissioner, Sub- Engineer and the Deputy Collector. He also submitted that amount in question is not used by him for his personal purpose but has been utilized only for the betterment of the hostel.
4. In furtherance of the departmental enquiry, the Joint Collector was appointed as Enquiry Officer while the Assistant Commissioner, Gwalior was appointed as Presiding Officer. The enquiry was conducted and thereafter, a report was submitted by the Enquiry Officer on 05/10/2021 wherein he found charge no.1 & 3 as proved while charge no.2 as partly proved.
5. Respondent no.3, thereafter, passed the impugned order dated 20/12/2021 thereby imposing major punishment of withholding of four increments with cumulative effect on the petitioner. It was held that the petitioner has withdrawn amount of scholarship and has used the same for repairing of mess and hostel and also for other use of hostel. This was found to be misuse of the Government funds and dereliction of duty on the part of the petitioner. Being aggrieved, the petitioner challenged the punishment order before respondent no.2 who vide order dated 02/05/2023 (Annexure-P/1) though upheld the findings of guilt against the petitioner, however, modified the major punishment inflicted by respondent no.3 into a minor punishment of stoppage of two increments without cumulative effect. Notably respondent no.2 rendered a finding that respondent no.3 was competent to impose only minor punishment on the petitioner and the major punishment inflicted by him is without jurisdiction. He, accordingly, rectified the mistake by modifying major punishment into a minor punishment. Challenging these orders passed by respondents no.2 & 3, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner challenged the impugned action initiated against the petitioner at the instance of respondent no.3 being without jurisdiction. It is his submission that the respondent no.3 has been empowered to inflict only minor punishment on Class-III & IV employee vide notification dated 23/05/1996 (Annexure-P/12). It is
Disciplinary charges invalid if vague without specific dates/times; spot reports cannot substitute full enquiries; salary stoppage on 'no work no pay' impermissible unless prescribed by rules with re....
: Service – Punishment - once the charges levelled against the delinquent employee are proved then it is for the appointing authority to decide as to what punishment should be imposed on the delinque....
Point of Law : It would not be safe to rely on the examination-in-chief recorded which was not subjected to cross examination before the summon was made.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.