S.TALAPATRA
Pranay Kumar Bhattacharjee, son of late Dayal Bandhu Bhattacharjee – Appellant
Versus
Tripura State Co-operative Bank Limited – Respondent
1. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the memoranda dated 24.01.2004 and 21.07.2004 (Annexures 2 and 3 respectively to the writ petition) and has urged this court for directing the respondents to revoke or rescind those memoranda dated 24.01.2004 and 21.07.2004 as well as to refund a sum of Rs.1,22,500 which has been recovered from the petitioner without observing any fair procedure.
2. The petitioner while working as the Supervisor in the Tripura State Cooperative Bank Limited, hereinafter referred to as “the bank-respondent”, received the memorandum bearing No.C-2/903/TSCB/Estt/10044-48/04 dated 24.01.2004 containing allegations, inter alia, that on 21.01.2004 there was a shortage of cash to the extent of Rs.2,45,000 resulted by fraudulent withdrawal of the cash. It had been further alleged that one Chan Mohan Saha, Branch Manager and the petitioner holding the post of Grade-III officers were responsible for such fraudulent withdrawal. By the said memorandum dated 24.01.2004 both the petitioner and Chan Mohan Saha were saddled with the financial liability in equal share and it was directed that a sum of Rs.1,22,500 would be recovered from both t
S.S. Rana Vs. Registrar, Coop. Societies & Anr.
Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi
Zoroastrian Coop. Housing Society Ltd. vs. Distt. Registrar, Coop. Societies (Urban)
Sabhajit Tewary vs. Union of India
Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi
Nayagarh Coop. Central Bank Ltd. Vs. Narayan Rath
U.P. State Cooperative Land Development Bank Ltd. Vs. Chandra Bhan Dubey & Ors.
Pradeep Kumar Biswas vs. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology & Ors.
Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs. International Airport Authority of India
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.