SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Tri) 214

S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Indrajit Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Bhaskar Deb, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Ratan Datta, Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

[1] Apprehending arrest in West Agartala P.S Case No.2020WAG206 under Sections 377 /506 IPC and Section 5 read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act FIR named accused Indrajit Ghosh has filed this application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. P.C hereunder) seeking release on pre arrest bail.

[2] The background facts of the case are as under:

The informant father of the victim (named withheld) lodged an FIR with the Officer-in-charge of the Ramnagar Police Outpost alleging, inter alia, that the accused who is a private tutor of his nine years old son committed sexual assault on his son by inserting his penis into the anus of his son. At the time of committing such offence the accused private tutor of his son gagged him so as to prevent him from shouting. After committing the offence the accused warned the son of the informant that in case the incidence was divulged by him to anybody, his parents would be killed and he would be handed over to police. After the occurrence symptoms of illness appeared. When his father asked him as to what happened to him, initially he was reluctant to say anything. Later, he told his mother that he was feeling pain in his

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top