SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Tri) 139

AKIL KURESHI, S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Bhaskar Deb – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Petitioner-in-person, for the Appellant; Mr. Debalay Bhattacharjee, GA, for the Respondent.

Table of Content
1. mandate of section 173(2)(ii) of cr.p.c. regarding communication of investigation outcomes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. dispute over compliance with statutory reporting requirements by police authorities. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's observation on the importance of compliance with section 173(2)(ii) of cr.p.c. (Para 6)
4. order for enhanced compliance with statutory communication requirements. (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER

1. Petitioner has raised an issue of the State Police authorities not following the mandate of Section 173 (2) (ii) of Cr.P.C. in large number of cases. The petitioner has raised an issue in public interest exhibiting no personal interest in the same.

2. Section 173 of Cr.P.C., pertains to report of police officer on completion of investigation. Sub-Section (1) of Section 173 provides that every investigation under the Chapter XII shall be completed without unnecessary delay. Clause (i) of sub-Section (2) of Section 173 provides that as soon as it is completed, the officer-in-charge of the police station shall forward to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence on a police report, a report in the form prescribed by the State Government stating various detai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top