SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Tri) 116

S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Rabia Begam – Appellant
Versus
Mansur Ali – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's marriage and circumstances of case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondent's denial of marriage and evidence issues. (Para 3 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court's detailed examination of evidence. (Para 6 , 8 , 12)
4. dismissal of the petition. (Para 7)
5. standard of proof for maintenance under section 125 cr.p.c. (Para 13)

JUDGMENT

S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. - By means of filing this criminal revision petition under section 397 read with section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C hereunder), Petitioner Smt. Rabia Begam has challenged the impugned judgment and order dated 05.04.2021 passed by the Family Court, Kailashahar in Crl. Misc. (125)-04 of 2020 declining to grant maintenance allowance to the petitioner in a proceeding under section 125 Cr.P.C.

2. Factual background of the case is as under:

Petitioner Rabia Begam filed a petition under section 125 Cr.P.C in Family Court, Kailashahar alleging that she was married to the respondent on 20.02.2009 in accordance with rites of Muslim marriage. After marriage, she accompanied her husband to his place. A Kabinnama was also executed on 15.06.2016. She claimed that she was married to the respondent during the subsistenc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top