SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 82

S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Ramu Saha @ Ramdas Saha – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. S. Lodh, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. S.S. Dey, Advocate General, Mr. R. Datta, P.P, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. Since these applications arise out of the same occurrence, they are taken up together for hearing and disposal by a common order.

2. Petitioners are accused in East Agartala PS case No.2021EAG160 registered under sections 341,325,384,307 read with section 34 IPC and section 25(1)(d) of the ARMS ACT , 1959.

3. Apprehending arrest in the case, they have filed these applications seeking pre arrest bail under section 438 Cr.P.C.

4. Heard Mr. S. Lodh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Heard Mr. S.S. Dey, learned Advocate General as well as Mr. R. Datta, learned P.P representing the State.

5. The Factual context of the case is as under:

One Subrata Kar, son of Late Swapan Kumar Kar of Dhaleswar, Agartala lodged a written FIR with the officer in charge of East Agartala police station alleging, inter alia, that on 21.11.2021 at about 8 O' clock in the night when he was crossing the road adjacent to Gedu Miah Masjid at Shibnagar on his motor bike, accused petitioner Nipu Ghosh detained him at the point of his pistol and snatched away a gold chain weighing about 15gm from his neck. The other three petitioners namely Debu Ghosh, Ramu Saha and Sajal Bardhan who were then acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top