SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 128

T. AMARNATH GOUD
Shantanu Mandal – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. S. Lodh, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. R. Datta, PP, for the Respondent

Table of Content
1. the jurisdiction and grounds for bail cancellation under section 439 of crpc. (Para 1 , 2 , 7)
2. factual background regarding bail applications and related orders. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. case law and principles regarding bail cancellation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. public interest and constitutional protections in bail considerations. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. conclusion dismissing the criminal petition. (Para 18)

JUDGMENT

1. Heard Mr. S. Lodh, counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. R. Datta, learned PP for the respondent.

2. This is a petition under Section 482 of CrPC for quashing/setting aside the impugned order dated 23.11.2021 passed by the Special Judge, Gomati District, Udaipur in Special 20 of 2021 (NDPS) whereby Special Judge cancelled the Bail Order dated 04.09.2021 granted in favour of the petitioner and thereafter release the petitioner on bail in terms of the order dated 04.09.2021.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that he has been wrongly and unlawfully arrayed in a criminal case. He stated in his petition that he was arrested in connection with Case No.2021/RKP/090 dated 07.06.2021 under Section 22 (C),25, 27(A) & 29 of NDPS Act. Thereafter, w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top