SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 128

T. AMARNATH GOUD
Shantanu Mandal – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. S. Lodh, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. R. Datta, PP, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. Heard Mr. S. Lodh, counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. R. Datta, learned PP for the respondent.

2. This is a petition under Section 482 of CrPC for quashing/setting aside the impugned order dated 23.11.2021 passed by the Special Judge, Gomati District, Udaipur in Special 20 of 2021 (NDPS) whereby Special Judge cancelled the Bail Order dated 04.09.2021 granted in favour of the petitioner and thereafter release the petitioner on bail in terms of the order dated 04.09.2021.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that he has been wrongly and unlawfully arrayed in a criminal case. He stated in his petition that he was arrested in connection with Case No.2021/RKP/090 dated 07.06.2021 under Section 22 (C),25, 27(A) & 29 of NDPS Act. Thereafter, while the investigation was being carried on, the petitioner made several attempts for bail applications. On 04.09.2021, according to the petitioner a bail application was moved on his behalf before the Ld. Special Judge, and after hearing the parties vide order dated 04.09.2021 the Special Judge granted bail to the petitioner with a condition that he should submit a bail bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh) only with 2(two( sureti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top