IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
BUDI HABUNG, J.
Basit Uddin S/o Shri Foiaz Uddin – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent
Crl. Pet No. 187 of 2024
Decided On : 04-11-2024
(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sections 439, 441, 446A - Bail - Issuance of Non-Bailable Warrant of Arrest (NBWA) against the accused without prior notice or cancellation of bail is improper. The court emphasized that bail can only be cancelled if conditions are violated, and due process must be followed. (Paras 20, 26, 29)
(B) The court ruled that the learned Special Judge (NDPS), Bomdila erred in issuing NBWA without first cancelling the bail granted by the High Court, which was not violated by the accused. (Paras 17, 30)
Facts of the case:
The accused, Shri Kamal Uddin, was granted bail but faced NBWA due to non-appearance, which was contested on grounds of procedural impropriety.
Findings of Court:
The court set aside the NBWA and directed the release of the accused, reaffirming the necessity of following legal procedures in bail matters.
Issues: The main issues were the legality of issuing NBWA without cancelling bail and the procedural rights of the accused.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the issuance of NBWA without prior notice or cancellation of bail violates the principles of natural justice and due process.
Result: Orders dated 12.12.2023, 23.02.2024, 08.04.2024, and 03.05.2024 set aside, and the accused directed to be released.
JUDGMENT :
BUDI HABUNG, J.
1. Heard Ms. T.Y. Bhutia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional PP for the State of AP.
2. This is an application filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) read with section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) for quashing and setting aside of the orders dated 12.12.2023, 23.02.2024, 08.04.2024 and 03.05.2024, passed by the learned Special Judge (NDPS), Bomdila for release of the accused, Shri Kamal Uddin on previous bail granted by this Court on 31.10.2022.
3. The case of the petitioner is that on 24/07/2022, an F.I.R was submitted by one Shri Sochi Don (Inspector, Seppa Police Station) against the accused person, Shri Apu Venia, after receiving information from reliable sources that the accused person was carrying some contraband substance with him and travelling in a bus from Itanagar to Seppa. After intercepting the vehicle in which the accused person was travelling, the Police team recovered suspected heroin weighing 54.33 gms with the weight of the vials and 5.38 gms without the vials, from a blue backpack which was in the possession of the accused, after which a case was registered vide Seppa P.S. Case No. 41/2022, under section 21(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985 and the case was endorsed to the I.O. for further investigation.
4. During the course of investigation, the accused person, Shri Apu Venia on being interrogated, disclosed that he had been procuring drugs from one Shri Saiful Islam and Shri Ashadul Ali, who were then arrested by the Seppa Police from Itakhola, Assam.
5. However, no any contraband substance was recovered from their possession during the search. On further interrogation, the arrested accused Shri Saiful Islam disclosed that he is a drug peddler as well as a user and that he has been selling drugs to Shri Apu Venia and Shri Ashadul Ali and that he has deposited around Rs. 1,00,000/- (One Lakh Only) to a Bandhan Bank account under the name of Shri Kapil Dev Shah and around Rs. 17,34,000/-(Seventeen Lakh Thirty Four Thousand Only) to another HDFC Bank account belonging to one Miss Poubinah Teinamei. Thereafter, according to the information gathered from the statement of the accused Shri Saiful Islam and co-accused Shri Ashadul Ali, a raid was conducted at Dimapur by the Arunachal Police with the help of Dimapur Police, wherein a huge consignment of 1 kg 200 gms of contraband drugs were confiscated from Shri Ashraf Hossain Choudhary, after which a fresh case was registered as Dimapur P.S. Case No. 0190/2022 u/s 22(c)/27(b) of the NDPS Act against Shri Ashraf Hossain Choudhary, Shri Kamal Uddin (the accused person herein) and Shri Shayan Chandra and all three accused persons were arrested and kept under the custody of Special Judge (NDPS), Dimapur.
6. After completion of the investigation, the case was submitted into chargesheet on 17/09/2022 and thereafter, a Supplementary Charge sheet was also filed on 03.04.2023 in Seppa P.S. Case no. 41/2022.
7. It is submitted that the accused person, Shri Kamal Uddin, along with other co-accused persons, Shri Ashraf Hossain Choudhary and Shri Shayan Chandra were apprehended in connection with Seppa P.S. Case No. 41/2022, however since they were arrested at Dimapur and booked under Dimapur P.S. Case No. 10190/2022, the I.O. of the case in Seppa P.S. Case No. 41/2022 moved an application before the Court of Special Judge (NDPS) at Bomdila for issuing production warrant and for transit remand against all three accused persons for interrogation and production before the Court of Special Judge (NDPS), Bomdila in connection with Seppa P.S Case No. 41/2022.
8. Thereafter, the accused person, Shri Kamal Uddin along with others were arrested in connection with Seppa P.S. Case no. 41/2022 on 10.09.2022.
9. Vide order dated 31.10.2022, passed by this Court in Bail applicat
AI
The court ruled that a Non-Bailable Warrant cannot be issued without prior cancellation of bail and due process, emphasizing the necessity of following legal procedures.
Public safety in narcotics cases supersedes technicalities. Bail can be revoked under Section 439(2) if new circumstances arise, reflecting the need to protect life and liberty. The burden of proof o....
The court ruled that a bail order confirmed by a higher court cannot be revoked by a co-ordinate bench without new evidence and proper procedures.
Cancellation of bail requires compelling evidence of misconduct or supervening circumstances affecting fairness of trial; mere subsequent offenses do not suffice.
Cancellation of bail requires substantial grounds indicating misuse or misconduct; mere allegations of injustice without evidence do not suffice for revocation.
The granting of bail under the NDPS Act must strictly adhere to statutory requirements; mere absence of contraband possession does not negate the necessity for robust scrutiny of evidence against the....
Bail should not be cancelled without clear evidence of violation of conditions or misuse of liberty, as established by the court's analysis.
The court has the authority to cancel bail if the order suffers from serious infirmities resulting in miscarriage of justice, and if the accused misuses their liberty, interferes with the investigati....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.