T. AMARNATH GOUD
Maheswar Das – Appellant
Versus
Sudhir Ch. Das – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This is a revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 09.12.2021 passed by Civil Judge, (Sr. Division), Court No.1, West Tripura, Agartala in Case No. T.S. 21 of 2019. The petitioner has also made this petition for revision of Order dated 09.12.2021 in Case No. TS 21 of 2019 as per true interpretation of Explanation IV- VI of Section 11 of CPC, 1908.
2. In a nutshell, the case of the petitioner is that one Kshireswar Das got allotment of land measuring 1.41 acres of land under Mouja-Pandavpur, Tehsil - Nehalchandrangar, Revenue Circle -Bishalgarh under Sadar Sub-Division. At Khatian No. 1401 of Mouja - Pandavpur was also created in his favour during his lifetime. He was in absolute physical possession over the entire gamut of land. During 1970, due to massive infiltration of Bangladeshi people during Indo-Pak war, a portion of land measuring 36 satak, i.e. 18 ganda was forcibly dispossessed by one Suresh Chandra Das, the father of Pro-Respondents Nos. 3 to 6. The original allottee as named above on humanitarian ground allowed them to occupy, truly not as a permissive possessor. On the strength of a purported registered Sale Dee
Ishwardas vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. AIR 1979 SC 551
The principle of res judicata bars claims on matters that have been previously adjudicated in a competent court, ensuring finality in litigation and preventing abuse of judicial resources.
The rejection of a plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC requires a focus solely on the averments in the plaint, not on the defendant's defenses or mixed questions of law and fact.
A plaint cannot be rejected based on constructive res-judicata at the initial stage; it requires full consideration of evidence.
The principle of res judicata applies where previous judgments on the same issue bind parties, regardless of claims involving part of the land. Judicial findings must reflect conscious application to....
An application for plaint rejection under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC only evaluates the plaint's contents without considering the defendant's defense. Res judicata principles need comprehensive analysis bey....
The civil court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes regarding Bargadarship per Section 21(1) of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.