SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 34

T. AMARNATH GOUD
Maheswar Das – Appellant
Versus
Sudhir Ch. Das – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. A. Nandi, Advocate, for the Petitioner; None, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. This is a revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 09.12.2021 passed by Civil Judge, (Sr. Division), Court No.1, West Tripura, Agartala in Case No. T.S. 21 of 2019. The petitioner has also made this petition for revision of Order dated 09.12.2021 in Case No. TS 21 of 2019 as per true interpretation of Explanation IV- VI of Section 11 of CPC, 1908.

2. In a nutshell, the case of the petitioner is that one Kshireswar Das got allotment of land measuring 1.41 acres of land under Mouja-Pandavpur, Tehsil - Nehalchandrangar, Revenue Circle -Bishalgarh under Sadar Sub-Division. At Khatian No. 1401 of Mouja - Pandavpur was also created in his favour during his lifetime. He was in absolute physical possession over the entire gamut of land. During 1970, due to massive infiltration of Bangladeshi people during Indo-Pak war, a portion of land measuring 36 satak, i.e. 18 ganda was forcibly dispossessed by one Suresh Chandra Das, the father of Pro-Respondents Nos. 3 to 6. The original allottee as named above on humanitarian ground allowed them to occupy, truly not as a permissive possessor. On the strength of a purported registered Sale Dee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top