SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 62

S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Benu Bhusan Das – Appellant
Versus
Land Acquisition Collector – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. K. K. Pal, Advocate, for the Appellants; None, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. Heard Mr. K. K. Pal, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. None appeared for the respondents despite service of notice.

2. This is an appeal under Section 54 of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT from the judgment and award dated 28.09.2018 delivered in Misc.(LA) 19 of 2015 by the Land Acquisition Judge (Court No.2), West Tripura, Agartala.

3. The facts are mostly admitted in as much as the respondents did not prefer any appeal nor have they filed any cross-objection. Moreover they did not appear despite receiving notice.

4. In terms of notification No.F.9(4)-REV/ACQ/XIV/07 dated 28th April, 2007 issued under Section 4 of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894, the land of the appellant measuring 0.0170 acres comprised in Plot No.9419/11003(P) in Madhupur mouza and recorded in Khatian No. 4321 was acquired for construction/up-gradation of link road from NH-44 (Amtali police station to B.R. Ambedkar Hospital at Hapania). The land according to the records falls in the Tilla class. The L.A Collector after hearing the claim of the appellant awarded a sum of Rs.30,897/- as the compensation inclusive of other components at the price of Rs.5,30,000/-(rupees five lakhs thirty thousand) p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top