SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 347

T. AMARNATH GOUD
Jyoti Rani Debnath – Appellant
Versus
Bimal Sutradhar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A. Acherjee and P. Gautam, Advocates, for the Appellant; P. Gautam and A. Acherjee, Advocates, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. - MAC Appeal No. 22 of 2021 has been filed under Section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 for enhancement of the awarded compensation of Rs. 12,82,552/- (Rupees Twelve Lakhs Eighty Two Thousand Five Hundred Fifty Two only) passed on 26.06.2020 by the learned Member Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No. 2, Gomati Judicial District Udaipur in T.S.(MAC) 48/2018, to the extent of Rs. 16,20,000/- or more and MAC Appl. No. 30 of 2020 has been filed under Section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 read with Section 168 of the Act ibid, against the impugned judgment and award dated 26.06.2020 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Gomati Judicial District, Udaipur, in Case No. T.S. (MAC) 48 of 2018.

2. Both these two Motor Accident Claim Appeals have been heard together and disposed of since both the appeals arise out of common judgment.

3. The facts in brief common in both these appeals are that on 17.09.2013, at about 09.00 pm, the deceased Chitta Ranjan Debnath was returning from his shop at Udaipur Market riding his bicycle and when he reached Khilpara on Udaipur road to Kakraban under R.K. Pur P.S. Udaipur, Gomati District, Tripura near Ga

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top