SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 399

S. TALAPATRA
Chandan Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
B. Banerjee, Advocate, for the Appellant; D. Sharma, Addl. G.A, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

S. Talapatra, J. - Heard Mr. B. Banerjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. D. Sharma, learned Addl. G.A. appearing for the respondents.

2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has urged this court to regularize his service as Attendant or in the post of similar category following the policy as reflected in the memorandum dated 21.01.2009 [Annexure-2 to the writ petition] and the memorandum dated 04.09.2012 [Annexure-3 to the writ petition] from 12.12.2012, when the junior of the petitioner was so regularized within a stipulated time as may be prescribed by this court. The petitioner has been working as the Attendant Group-D with effect from 01.04.2006 till now. The petitioner is class-VIII passed and he is the sole bread earner of the family. In support of his contention, the petitioner has produced the certificate of the educational qualification along with the vouchers by which his wages are paid by the respondents [Annexure-4 collectively] [pages 25-388]. After such long service, the petitioner approached the respondents for regularization of his service in terms of the memorandum dated 21.01.2009 [Annexure-2 to the writ petition] and the m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top