SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 370

ARINDAM LODH
Setu Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Table of Content
1. conviction based on victim's testimony. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. defense claims enmity, medical report discrepancies. (Para 9 , 11)
3. victim's consistent disclosure corroborated by witnesses. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. presumption of guilt; offense establishment independent of injury. (Para 17)
5. appeal dismissed; appellant must surrender. (Para 18)

JUDGMENT

Arindam Lodh, J. - Heard Mr. Kawsik Nath, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. S. Debnath, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State-respondent.

2. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 09.02.2021, passed by the Ld. Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Unakoti Judicial District, Kailashahar, in Case No. Special (POCSO) 10/2019 whereby and whereunder the appellant herein has been convicted under Section 8 of POCSO Act and was sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for three years.

3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that, on the fateful date and time the victim was taken by the appellant to his nearby house. After they entered into the room the appellant had closed all the doors and the windows of the room. In the complaint it i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top