Chandan Adhikari vs State of Tripura

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Tri) 175

T. AMARNATH GOUD, ARINDAM LODH
Chandan Adhikari – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. A. Das, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Ratan Datta, PP, Mr. S. Debnath, Addl. PP, for the Respondent

Table of Content
1. details of the incident leading to the conviction. (Para 3 , 4)
2. arguments put forth by the defense and prosecution. (Para 5 , 6)
3. review of evidence and circumstances surrounding the incident. (Para 8 , 9)
4. alteration of sentencing based on circumstances. (Para 10)
5. final verdict and modification of the lower court's decision. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. - Heard Mr. A. Das, learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as Mr. Ratan Datta, learned PP assisted by Mr. S. Debnath, learned Additional PP appearing on behalf of the respondent.

2. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 20.04.2021 passed in connection with case No. S.T.(T-1) 12 of 2016 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sepahijala District, Bishalgarh, whereby and whereunder the learned Additional Sessions Judge had convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Sections 447 /326/307 IPC, and sentenced him to suffer R.I. for 10 (ten) years with default stipulation.

3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on 11.09.2014 at 16.30 hours the appellant entered into the house of the complainant and started shouting and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document