SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 175

T. AMARNATH GOUD, ARINDAM LODH
Chandan Adhikari – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. A. Das, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Ratan Datta, PP, Mr. S. Debnath, Addl. PP, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. - Heard Mr. A. Das, learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as Mr. Ratan Datta, learned PP assisted by Mr. S. Debnath, learned Additional PP appearing on behalf of the respondent.

2. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 20.04.2021 passed in connection with case No. S.T.(T-1) 12 of 2016 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sepahijala District, Bishalgarh, whereby and whereunder the learned Additional Sessions Judge had convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Sections 447 /326/307 IPC, and sentenced him to suffer R.I. for 10 (ten) years with default stipulation.

3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on 11.09.2014 at 16.30 hours the appellant entered into the house of the complainant and started shouting and abusing him, and at that time Goutam Adhikari, another nephew of the complainant arrived there on hearing the shouting of the accused and asked the reason of his shouting and then the accused got furious and attacked upon Gautam Adhikari taking out a dagger (sharp knife) due to which said Gautam Adhikari sustained grievous bleeding injury on his abdomen and the ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top