SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 341

T. AMARNATH GOUD
Rahul Dey – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P. Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate and A. Debbarma, Advocate, for the Appellant; M. Debbarma, Addl. G.A, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. - The writ petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other direction or directions and/or order or orders of like nature directing the respondents to implement the Order of demolition of the unauthorized building, dated, 23.08.2021 and 29.01.2021 issued by the Assistant Municipal Commissioner, Central Zone AMC.

2. The case of the writ petitioner is that he has prayed for necessary direction upon the respondents No. 1 to 4 to demolish the unauthorized and illegal structure of the respondent No. 5 as per the orders dated 23.08.2021 and 29.01.2021 issued by the Assistant Municipal Commissioner, Central Zone, AMC.

3. The petitioner earlier filed WP(C) No. 504 of 2020, before the Court of the then Chief Justice, High Court of Tripura, Mr. Akil Kureshi objecting to the construction of a building which has been started by the respondent No. 5. This Court vide order dated 10.12.2020 disposed of the said writ petition by directing the AMC to complete the proceeding for removal/demolition of the construction. This Court further directed that respondent No. 5, shall not carry out any construction without

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top