SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 163

T. AMARNATH GOUD, S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Himadri Sekhar Roy – Appellant
Versus
Bulti Saha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. A. Sengupta, Advocate, for the Appellant(s); Mr. S. Lodh, Advocate, for the Respondent(s)

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. - This is an appeal under Section 19(1) of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984 read with Section 28 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 against the judgment dated 12.04.2021 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Agartala, West Tripura in Case No.T.S. (Divorce) 67 of 2019 whereby the petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed.

2. The brief fact is that the appellant husband being the petitioner filed a petition bearing No.T.S.(Divorce)67 of 2019 in the Court of the learned Judge, Family Court, West Tripura, Agartala under clause (ia) of sub-section 1 of Section 13 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 against the respondent-wife for dissolution of their marriage by a decree of divorce.

3. The fact of the case as arrived in the divorce petition is that the marriage of the appellant husband and the respondent wife was solemnized on 18.02.2017 as per Hindu Rites and Customs. After the marriage, the respondent wife came to the house of the appellant husband to live with him as husband and wife. The appellant is the only son of his mother Smt. Rekha Roy and he has only one youngest sister, namely Reshmi Roy Banik who is also married and having happy conjugal life a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top