SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 107

T. AMARNATH GOUD, ARINDAM LODH
Ripna Majumder – Appellant
Versus
Haradhan Majumder – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mrs. P. Dhar, Advocate, for the Appellant; None, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. - This is an appeal filed under Section 19 of the FAMILY COURTS ACT read with Section 28 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT against the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2015 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Unakoti Tripura in Title Suit (Divorce) 24 of 2012.

2. The facts in brief, which may be relevant for the present purpose and as manifested on the record are that the marriage between the appellant-wife and the respondent-husband was solemnized on 29.02.1996 as per Hindu rites and they started living together as husband and wife in the house of the respondent herein. They passed happy conjugal life for 4(four) years, during that period, a female child and a male child were born. Both of them now have attained majority. After about 4(four) years of the birth of their children, the appellant-wife herein showed displeasure to perform household works and behaved very rudely upon her husband and his old-age mother. The husband-respondent and his old-age mother objected but his wife tried to assault them with 'dao', 'lathi' etc., by using bad language. As such finding no other alternative, the husband-respondent herein was compelled to live separately from

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top