SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 135

T. AMARNATH GOUD, S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Rupali Paul (Datta) – Appellant
Versus
Sukanta Datta – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Pulak Saha, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Debajit Biswas, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. - Heard Mr. Pulak Saha, learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as Mr. D. Biswas, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

2. This is an appeal filed under section 19 of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984. It arises from the judgment dated 17.01.2020 delivered in Title Suit (Divorce) 50 of 2018 by the Judge, Family Court, Kailashahar, Unakoti Judicial District dissolving the marriage between the appellant and his wife.

3. Brief fact of the case is as under:

Marriage between the respondent husband and appellant wife was solemnized in the year 2009 as per Hindu Rites and Customs. In their wedlock, a daughter namely, Rima Datta was born. The respondent is a contractual teacher serving under the Department of Education. The appellant stated in her petition that after five months of peaceful conjugal life, her respondent husband and his parents started making illegal demand of dowry to which she denied and as a result she was subjected to torture by her respondent husband and his parents. This apart, she was often blamed for her dark complexion and ugliness. The appellant wife was also subjected to torture by her respondent husband at the administra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top