Civil courts lack jurisdiction to adjudicate on land allotment orders issued under the Tripura Land Revenue & Lands Reforms Act, affirming the need for plaintiffs to demonstrate legal possession and entitlement.

JUDGMENT

1. This present secnd appeal has been filed under Sectin 100 f the Cde f Civil Prcedure, 1908, read with rder XLII Rule 1 fr reversing the impugned Judgment and Decree dated 16.07.2018 & 18.07.2018 respectively passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senir Divisin, Udaipur, Gmati Tripura in Title Suit N.21 f 2017 and the impugned Judgment and Decree dated 30.08.2019 and 02.09.2019 passed by the learned District Judge, Gmati Tripura, Udaipur in Title Appeal N.07 f 2018 and thereupn, fr decreeing the suit, filed by the plaintiff-appellants.

2. The facts f the case, in brief, are that the subject matter f the present suit is land measuring 0.07 acre under alltted-khatian N.815, Hal Plt N.1613/2762 situated at Muja - Uttar Chandrapur appertaining t Hal Plt N.1613 f area 0.20 acres, i.e., ttal 0.27 acres described in 'A' schedule f the plaint. The plaintiff-appellants herein asserted that cnsidering their pssessin ver 'A' Schedule land the cmpetent authrity alltted the entire 'A' Schedule land in the names f the plaintiff-appellants herein vide Alltment rder N.40 dated 26-04-1991. Accrdingly, the allttee Khatian N.815 was prepared in their name n 07-08-1992. Subsequently, the cmputerized printed Khatian N.815 was generated in respect f the said alltted land f the plaintiffs. But in the said Khatian, errneusly, in Clumn N.6 the name and father's name f the plaintiff-appellant N.1 was wrngly typed as Sadhan Chandra Dey, S/ Upendra Chandra Dey instead f Sadhan Chandra Chanda, S/ Upendra Chandra Chanda and als the name f plaintiff N.2 as Sefali Dey instead f Sefali Chanda. Accrdingly, the plaintiffs made a prayer befre the Sub-Divisinal Magistrate, Udaipur fr crrectin f the said errr in Clumn N.6 f the cmputerized printed Khatian N.815. The said matter is pending fr dispsal. Accrding t the plaintiffs, in the last part f Nvember 2011 the defendants dispssessed them frm the entire land f Hal Plt N.1613/2762 f an area measuring 0.07 acres which is described as Schedule 'C' in the plaint and which is part f the 'A' schedule land. Since then the defendants have been illegally pssessing Schedule 'C' land by cnstructing dwelling huts and have been residing with their family members. The remaining land f Schedule 'A' f the plaint, i.e., the land f Plt N.1614, an area measuring 0.20 acres is described as Schedule 'B' land in the plaint. Accrding t the plaintiff-appellants they have been pssessing the Schedule 'B' land as wners t the knwledge f the lcal peple including the present defendants t date. The defendants have illegally pssessed the 'C' Schedule land since the last part f Nvember 2011, and, they need t be evicted. The defendants n 02-06-2017 attempted t dispssess the plaintiffs frm the Schedule 'B' land by cutting mud frm the part f the said land but failed due t resistance put up by the plaintiffs.

3. n the said premises, the plaintiffs prayed fr a decree f declaratin f the right, title, and interest ver Schedule 'A' land alng with a perpetual injunctin restraining the defendants frm entering int the Schedule 'B' land and fr recvery f pssessin f the Schedule 'C' land.

4. n the ther hand, defendants Ns.1 and 2 cntested the suit by filing the written statement. Accrding t the defendants, their father was residing at Uttar Chandrapur frm the year 1979 by purchasing sme lands adjacent t the CS Plt N.1174/1658 which was a khas land measuring 0.07 acres. They cnstructed dwelling huts n 0.07 acre f khas land in the year 1979 and in the lifetime f their father, they als cnstructed a pucca wall with pucca rf with GI sheet rf and a dwelling huse. Accrdin