Apurba Chakraborty vs Tapan Chakraborty (Plaintiff)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Tri) 269

T. AMARNATH GOUD, S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Apurba Chakraborty – Appellant
Versus
Tapan Chakraborty (Plaintiff) – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. D.K. Daschoudhury, Advocate., for the Appellant; Mr. A. Sengupta, Advocate., for the Respondent

Table of Content
1. inheritance and distribution of ancestral property. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. process and claims for partition of undivided land. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. framing of issues in property disputes. (Para 14)
4. trial court decision on partition claim. (Para 16)
5. appellants' arguments and court's scrutiny of evidence. (Para 17 , 19 , 20)
6. final ruling and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. - This is an appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgment dated 09.04.2018 and decree dated 23.04.2018 passed in T.S.(Partition) 13 of 2015 by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Udaipur, District: Gomati Tripura.

2. The facts leading to this appeal are that respondent No.1 being the plaintiff preferred the suit seeking partition and separate possession of ancestral landed property of himself and the defendants-respondents No.2 to 18 (hereinafter called the respondents) as inherited from Nagendranath Chakraborty (since deceased) in respect of the land as described in 'Schedule A' of the pliant measuring 3.50 acres recorded in Khatians No.432(1 to 3) mouza Uttar Chandrapur, Tehshil: Matarbari, Sub-di