Back
ARINDAM LODH
Lipika Roy Bhowmik – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arindam Lodh, J. - It is submitted that the issues involved in these writ petition are yet to be settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in special leave petition filed by the respondents-State.
2. In view of this, list the matters on 22.05.2023.
3. Registry is directed to reflect the name of Mr. BN Majumder, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. DJ Saha, learned counsel in the cause list appearing in WP(C) 46 of 2022.
Pending issues in writ petitions require resolution by the Supreme Court before further proceedings can continue.
Writ petitions should adhere to procedural rules and timelines, with the court allowing amendments due to subsequent events.
Affidavits in writ petitions must be truthful and not misleading; prior rulings affect maintainability.
The court allowed the state to withdraw an affidavit to file a revised one and scheduled subsequent proceedings.
Court allows joint hearing of connected writ petitions for efficiency when parties have appeared.
The court emphasized the importance of procedural integrity by consolidating related writ petitions to ensure fair adjudication in light of Supreme Court directives.
The Court refrained from passing any order due to the pendency of a similar issue before the Apex Court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
