Rupak Banik vs Suparna Paul - 2022 Supreme(Tri) 94

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Tri) 94

S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Rupak Banik – Appellant
Versus
Suparna Paul – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. A. Bhowmik, Advocate, Mr. S. Dey, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. R. Datta, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT & ORDER

1. This is an appeal filed under Section 19(1) of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984 assailing the Judgment dated 16.03.2021 passed in T.S.(Null) 1 of 2020 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Sonamura, Sepahijala Tripura whereby the learned Court below declared the marriage between the appellant and the respondent dated 10.08.2019 as null and void.

2. The fact of the case, in brief, according to the appellant-Sri Rupak Banik is that, the respondent herein, Smt. Suparna Paul is the legally wedded wife of the respondent and their marriage was solemnized at the house of Nidhan Paul of village-Office tilla, under Bishalgarh P.S. on 10th August 2019 according to Hindu religion, Vedic rites and ceremonies. The marriage declaration was done between them on 6th September 2019 before the Notary Public at Bishalgarh. After that, a 'certificate of marriage' bearing No.148 SDM/BLG/JDL was also issued on 13.09.2019 in favour of them.

After marriage, the respondent-wife herein always insisted upon the appellant that he should live apart from the other members of his family, and the respondent used to detest not only the parents of the appellant but also the other members of the family.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document