Rupak Banik vs Suparna Paul - 2022 Supreme(Tri) 94

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Tri) 94

S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Rupak Banik – Appellant
Versus
Suparna Paul – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. A. Bhowmik, Advocate, Mr. S. Dey, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. R. Datta, Advocate, for the Respondent.

Table of Content
1. marriage declaration and circumstances surrounding it (Para 1 , 2)
2. denial of marriage validity and claims made by the respondent (Para 3 , 4)
3. issues framed and trial court's findings (Para 5 , 6)
4. arguments presented regarding the marriage legitimacy (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. court's reasoning and judgment upheld (Para 11 , 12)
6. directives for legal assistance and closure of pending applications (Para 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT & ORDER

1. This is an appeal filed under Section 19(1) of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984 assailing the Judgment dated 16.03.2021 passed in T.S.(Null) 1 of 2020 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Sonamura, Sepahijala Tripura whereby the learned Court below declared the marriage between the appellant and the respondent dated 10.08.2019 as null and void.

2. The fact of the case, in brief, according to the appellant-Sri Rupak Banik is that, the respondent herein, Smt. Suparna Paul is the legally wedded wife of the respondent and their marriage was solemnized at the house of Nidhan Paul of village-Office tilla, under Bishalgarh P.S. on 10th August 2019 according to Hindu religion, Vedic rites and ceremonies. The marriage declaration was done between them on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document