SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Tri) 40

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
BISWAJIT PALIT, J.
 
Shri Prasanta Tripura, S/o. Sri Sourindra Mohan Tripura – Petitioner 
Versus
The State of Tripura, to be represented by the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Tripura and Ors. – Respondents.
W.P.(C) No.430 of 2024
Decided On : 10-01-2025
 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Adv. Mr. Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. K. De, Addl. G.A.

Recovery of excess payments from Group-C employees is impermissible if the excess payment was made for over five years, as established in prior judgments.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ of Mandamus - Recovery of excess payment - The petitioner challenged the withdrawal of ACP-I benefits and recovery of excess payments made without due process. The court found that recovery from the petitioner was impermissible under the principles established in State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Rafiq Masih (2015) 4 SCC 334, as the petitioner was a Group-C employee and the excess payment was made for a period exceeding five years. (Paras 12-15)

(B) Recovery of excess payments - The court emphasized that recovery is not permissible from employees of Group-C and D services when the excess payment has been made for a period exceeding five years. (Paras 12-15)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was appointed as a Computer Operator and later granted ACP-I benefits. The benefits were withdrawn without opportunity, leading to a previous writ petition that restored the benefits. The recent order sought to recover excess payments made to the petitioner.

Findings of Court:
The court quashed the recovery order, stating it would be unjust and harsh to the petitioner.

Issues: The main issues were the legality of the recovery of excess payments and the applicability of the principles established in prior judgments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that recovery of excess payments from the petitioner was impermissible as it would be inequitable and harsh, reaffirming the principles laid down in Rafiq Masih's case.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

JUDGMENT :

BISWAJIT PALIT, J.

Heard Learned Senior Counsel Mr. P. Roy Barman assisted by Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and also heard Mr. K. De, Learned Addl. G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents.

2. By means of filing this writ petition, the present petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:

(i) Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why Writ in the nature of mandamus and/or Order/direction shall not be issued whereby quashing and cancelling the letter, dated, 10.04.2024, issued by the District Magistrate & Collector, South Tripura, Belonia.

(ii) Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why Writ in the nature of mandamus and/or Order/direction shall not be issued whereby quashing and cancelling the impugned Memo, No.2(16)-BDO/RPC/ESTT/2018/33, dated 12-04.2024, issued by the Block Development Officer, Rupaichari R.D. Block, South Tripura, Belonia.

(iii) Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why Writ in the nature of mandamus and/or Order/direction shall not be issued whereby directing the Respondents not to cause any recovery from the Petitioner in connection with his ACP-I financial benefits.

(iv) Make the rules absolute.

(v) Call for records.

(vi) Pass any further order/orders as this Hon’ble High Court considered fit and proper.

3. The brief facts of this writ petition is that according to the petitioner vide Order No.1/22- A/DM/S/ESTT/151, dated 19.02.2004, issued by the District Magistrate & Collector, South Tripura District, Udaipur the petitioner was appointed to the post of Computer Operator in Community Information Centre, under the Directorate of Information Technology (Department of Industries and Commerce) on contract basis for a period of two years on the terms and conditions mentioned in the order and after appointment the petitioner joined under the respondents w.e.f. 21.02.2004. Copy of this order is annexed with this petition marked as Annexure-1. Thereafter, vide notification dated 27.06.2009 issued by the Joint Secretary, Rural Development Department, the Governor was pleased to grant regular scale of pay of Rs.4200-8650/-52 Computer Operators (CIC) (Group-C, Non-Gazetted), including the petitioner after completion of six years of continuous service without break on fixed pay basis. It was also mentioned that the past services of those 52 nos. Computer Operators under CIC rendered in the IT Department would be taken into consideration for future service benefit. The notification dated 27.06.2009 is annexed with this petition marked as Annexure-2.

4. Thereafter vide order dated 10.04.2013 issued by the DM & Collector, South Tripura, Belonia the petitioner along with others was regularized on completion of five years of continuous service on fixed pay basis to the post of Senior Computer Operator (CIC) in Rural Development Department vide Order No.F.8(4)-RD/06(Shadow-I)2370, dated 29.12.2009 was provided the regular scale of pay on completion of five years of continuous service on 20.02.2009 under PB No.2, Rs.5310-24,000/-, Grade pay of Rs.2100/- plus admissible allowance w.e.f. 20.02.2009. Copy of this order dated 10.04.2013 is annexed with this petition marked as Annexure-3.

5. Thereafter, vide Order No.2(24)- DM/S/ESTT/2017/784 dated 28.12.2017 issued by the District Magistrate & Collector, South Tripura, Belonia, the petitioner along with others was allowed benefit of ACP-I w.e.f 21.02.2014. It is mentioned in the said order that the petitioner has been allowed benefit of ACP-I on completion of his 10 years of regular and satisfactory service from the date of his entry into Govt. service, i.e., 21.02.2004 and the effective date from which such ACP shall be admissible was determined as 21.02.2014. As such, the petitioner was allowed one increment on the pay of existing pay Band and Grade pay plus next available grade pay as benefit of financial up-gradation under the ACP scheme. Copy of the order dated 28.12.2017 is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top