SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Tri) 52

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA, AGARTALA
BISWAJIT PALIT, J. 
 
Smt. Jharna Rani Acharjee, W/o. Sri Kartik Acharjee – Appellant
Versus
Sri Tapan Saha, S/o. Haridas Saha and Anr. – Respondents
MAC App. No.49 of 2024 along with CO(FA) No.7 of 2024
Decided On : 31-01-2025
 

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. J. Majumder, Adv., Mr. A. K. Deb, Adv.

The assessment of compensation for permanent disability must consider its impact on earning capacity, not just the percentage of disability.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166 and 173 - Appeal for enhancement of compensation due to permanent disability from a road traffic accident - The Tribunal awarded Rs.2,77,557/- which was challenged for being inadequate. The claimant-appellant sustained severe injuries leading to permanent disability and loss of income. The court found the Tribunal's assessment of disability and income inadequate, modifying the compensation to Rs.5,42,356.96/- with 9% interest. (Paras 19, 4, 6, 15, 16)

(B) Compensation Assessment - The court emphasized that the assessment of permanent disability must consider its impact on earning capacity, not merely the percentage of disability. The Tribunal's reliance on temporary disability was deemed improper. (Paras 10, 12)

Facts of the case:
The claimant-appellant suffered severe injuries in a road accident on 27.11.2019, resulting in permanent disability and loss of income. The initial compensation awarded was deemed insufficient.

Findings of Court:
The court modified the compensation to Rs.5,42,356.96/- based on a reassessment of income and disability.

Issues: The main issues were the adequacy of the compensation awarded and the proper assessment of permanent disability.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Tribunal must actively assess the impact of permanent disability on earning capacity, not just apply a percentage of disability mechanically.

Result: The appeal is partly allowed, and the compensation is enhanced to Rs.5,42,356.96/-.

JUDGMENT :

BISWAJIT PALIT, J.

This appeal under Section 173 of M.V. Act is preferred by the claimant-appellant for enhancement of the award dated 19.03.2024 delivered by Learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.2, Gomati District, Udaipur in connection with case No. TS(MAC) No.36 of 2020. The connected CO(FA) No.7 of 2024 is also preferred by the cross-objector-Insurance Company under Order 41 Rule 22 of CPC read with Section 151 of CPC against the appeal bearing No.MAC App. No.49 of 2024 filed by the respondent-claimant. Both the matters are taken up together for hearing and accordingly, by this judgment both the matters are disposed of.

2. Heard Learned Counsel, Mr. J. Majumder appearing on behalf of the claimant-appellant and also heard Learned Counsel, Mr. A. K. Deb appearing on behalf of the objector.

3. Before proceeding with the merit of the appeal, let us discuss about the subject matter of the claim petition for which this present appeal has arisen. The appellant as claimant filed one application under Section 166 of M.V. Act to the Learned Tribunal below claiming compensation due to injury suffered by a road traffic accident which took place on 27.11.2019 at about 11:30 am at Rajarbag Jeep Stand, Udaipur under R. K. Pur P.S. The claimant-appellant in her claim petition stated that on 27.11.2019 at about 11:30 am when the claimant-appellant, Smt. Jharna Rani Acharjee was about to board the vehicle bearing registration No.TR-01-E-2006 (Bolero Plus) for proceeding towards Agartala from Udaipur Jeep Stand, that time, she had gone to the backside of the vehicle when the said vehicle dashed against her resulting which she sustained trauma on left eye and face following severe orbital fracture left side and multiple bleeding injuries all over her body. Soon after the accident, the victim was taken to Gomati District Hospital but considering the gravity of injuries, she was referred to AGMC & GBP Hospital, Agartala wherein she was admitted and treated up to 16.12.2019 as an indoor patient. Again, on 23.12.2019, the claimant-appellant was referred to Susrat Eye Foundation & Research Centre, Kolkata for better treatment. On 28.12.2019, the claimant-appellant had visited the said Research centre at Kolkata wherein several X-ray and medical examinations were done. After prolonged treatment also, the claimant-appellant did not recover from injuries and she had lost her eye sight. The claimant-appellant also averred that due to accident she had become permanently disabled and lost her working capacity and longevity of life. On this issue, a written ejahar was filed to O/C, R. K. Pur PS which was registered as R.K. Pur case No.200 of 2019 under Section 279/338 of IPC and also under Section 177/187 of M.V. Act. It was also stated that the accident took place due to rash and negligent driving of vehicle by the driver of the said vehicle bearing No.TR-01-E-2006. Hence, the appellant as claimant filed the claim petition claiming compensation.

The opposite parties contested the proceeding by filing written statement. The O.P. No.1 being the owner-cum-driver of the vehicle bearing No.TR-01-E-2006 (Bolero Plus) took the plea that there was no rash and negligent act on his part for the said accident and, as such, he denied the averments made by the claimantappellant in her claim petition and further submitted that on the alleged day, the vehicle was duly insured with the respondentInsurance Company. The respondent-Insurance Company also denied the assertions made by the appellant-claimant in the claim petition and submitted that the claim petition was subjected to strict proof by the claimant-appellant.

Upon the pleading of the parties, Learned Tribunal below framed the following issues:

i) Whether Smt. Jharna Rani Acharjee, W/O Sri Kartik Acharjee sustained injuries in a road traffic accident on 27.11.2019 at aoubt 10:30 am at Udaipur Rajarbag Jeep Stand, under R. K. Pur due to rash and negligent driving by driver of the vehicle bearing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top