SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Tri) 75

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA, AGARTALA
T. AMARNATH GOUD, J.
 
Sri Rupak Nandi, S/o. Late Phani Bhushan Nandi and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Tripura, Represented by the Secretary, Home Department Government of Tripura and ors. – Respondents 
WP(C) No. 673 of 2024
Decided On : 10-03-2025
 
Advocates Appeared :
For the Petitioners : Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate, Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, Advocate, Mr. K. Nath, Advocate. 
For the Respondents : Mr. SM Chakraborty, Advocate General, Mr. D. Sarma, Addl. G.A. 

Advocates:
Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate, Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, Advocate, Mr. K. Nath, Advocate, Mr. SM Chakraborty, Advocate General, Mr. D. Sarma, Addl. G.A.

The court ruled that pension for retired Home Guards is a welfare scheme, not a statutory entitlement, limiting judicial intervention in pension increases.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 21 - Writ petition for enhancement of pension - Petitioners, retired Home Guards, sought to increase their pension from Rs. 2500 to Rs. 10,000 due to rising costs of living and dignity in old age - The court noted that pension is not under statutory rules but a welfare scheme - The petitioners' claims were dismissed as the court found no basis for the demand and emphasized the discretionary nature of welfare schemes. (Paras 2, 10, 11, 12, 14)

(B) Judicial Review - The court held that it cannot interfere in the formulation of welfare schemes as it is the prerogative of the State Government. (Paras 11, 13)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, retired Home Guards, were receiving a monthly pension of Rs. 2500, which was previously Rs. 750, and sought an increase to Rs. 10,000 due to inflation and the need for a dignified living. They had previously filed representations and a writ petition regarding their pension.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the pension scheme is not statutory and that the petitioners cannot demand a specific amount without a legal basis.

Issues: The main issues were whether the petitioners were entitled to a pension increase and the nature of the pension scheme.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the pension is a welfare scheme and not a statutory entitlement, thus limiting the court's ability to mandate increases.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

T. AMARNATH GOUD, J.

Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. SM Chakraborty, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. D. Sarma, learned Addl. GA appearing for the respondents-State.

[2] The brief facts of the case is that, the petitioners are retired Home Guards. The petitioners are getting only Rs. 2500/- as monthly pension. In this instant writ petition the petitioners seek necessary direction upon the respondents to enhance the monthly pension of the petitioners from Rs. 2500/- to Rs.10,000/- per month. During last decade the purchasing power of rupees has suffered tremendous erosion. After retirement, the petitioners are also entitled to decent pension and they are also entitled to live in dignity. As a senior citizens, the petitioners are entitled to be not treated with cruelty and the State has responsibility and obligation to ensure, that, the petitioners who served the Nation and the State as Home-Guard before their retirement, do not suffer destitution and deprivation due to meagre pension which presently they are getting.

[3] The petitioners herein sought for the following reliefs by filing this instant writ petition :-

“a. Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why a Writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other order/orders shall not be issued whereby directing the Respondents to enhance monthly pension of the Petitioners from Rs 2,500 to Rs 10,000/-per months.

b. Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why a Writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other order/orders shall not be issued whereby modifying the Notification, dated, 16.01.2023, issued by the Deputy Secretary, Govt. of Tripura, Home Department, by enhancing monthly pension in respect of retired Home Guard Volunteers under the Home Department, Govt. of Tripura, from Rs 2500/- to Rs 10,000/- per month.

c. Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why a Writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other order/orders shall not be issued whereby quashing the Memo, dated, 31.05.2024, issued by the Under Secretary to the Govt. of Tripura, Home Department.

AND

Call for the records pertaining to the instant Writ Petition from the custody of the Respondents and to make the rule absolute.”

[4] Mr. P Roy Barman, learned senior counsel submits before this Court that the petitioners are the retired Home Guards. By a Notification dated 15.11.2012, issued by the Deputy Secretary, Govt. of Tripura, Home Department formulated a pension scheme for providing pension to the retired Home Guards. As per the said scheme the eligible Home Guards should be entitled to Rs. 750/- per month as monthly pension. After retirement the petitioners had been provided pension under the aforesaid scheme upto 30.11.2022. Thereafter, monthly pension of the petitioners has been enhanced to Rs. 2500/- per month. Since, 01.12.2022, there has been no revision of monthly pension but, in the meantime the cost of living has risen tremendously.

[5] He also submits that the petitioners submitted several representation before the concerned respondents for enhancing their monthly pension to Rs. 10,000/- per month for better living standards as the present pension scheme fails to meet with their basic requirement. Thereafter, finding no alternative the petitioners filed writ petition vide No.W.P(C) No. 897 of 2022 wherein the Hon’ble Court by an order dated 10.02.2023 directed the concerned respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. He further submits that during the pendency of this writ petition the Deputy Secretary, Govt. of Tripura, Home Department, by a notification dated 16.01.2023, conveyed the decision of the Govt. that the monthly pension of the petitioners has already been enhanced from Rs.750/- to 2500/- per month. Thereafter, in compli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top