VED PRAKASH VAISH
Rramberco M. Marak – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
V.P. VAISH, J.
1. The present petition is directed against the respondents for quashing the impugned order dated 23rd February, 2015 whereby the services of the petitioner were terminated. The petitioner also prays for releasing his salary for the months of November, December, 2014 and January, February, 2015 besides he also seeks reinstatement in service.
2. Briefly recapitulating the facts as stated in the petition are that the Deputy Inspector of Schools vide Memo dated 20th July 2010 invited applications for appointment to the post of Data Entry Operator Cum-Office Assistant in the office of the Deputy Inspector of School with a fixed monthly honorarium of Rs. 10,000/- . The petitioner applied for the said post and participated in the interview.
3. The petitioner was duly selected for appointment to the said post of Data Entry Operator Cum-Office Assistant. It is stated that the petitioner had been working sincerely and faithfully with the full satisfaction of the higher authorities. The petitioner never failed to perform his duties and always regular in attending the office.
4. It is further stated by the petitioner that there was no complaint or adverse remarks against
Madhya Pradesh Hasta Shilpa Vikas Nigam Ltd Vs. Devendra Kumar Jain
State Of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Kaushal Kishore Shukla
Commissioner, Food And Civil Supplies, Lucknow, U.P Vs. Prakash Chandra Saxena
Triveni Shankar Saxena Vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.