SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Megh) 94

H. S. THANGKHIEW
Rohit Kumar Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Director General, Border Security Force – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
None, for the Petitioner; Mr. R. Debnath, CGC, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner, on the last date also no appearance was made.

2. By the order dated 26.03.2021, Mr. R. Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner had prayed that he may be allowed to file an additional affidavit bringing on record the order passed in WP(C) No. 282 of 2014. He further prayed that he may be allowed to enter the correct date in the writ petition before the Registry, the same till date unfortunately has not been done.

3. No counsel appears when the matter has been called out, accordingly this matter stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top