W. DIENGDOH
Bistimorial Nongsiej – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Being highly aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgment dated 15.02.2019 passed by the learned Additional Deputy Commissioner (Judicial), West Khasi Hills, Nongstoin in Civil Revision No. 1 of 2017, the petitioner has now approached this Court with this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
2. The background of the case as could be seen from the petition is that the petitioner is said to be the owner and in possession of a plot of land measuring 18,427 sq. meters more or less, situated at Nongstoin- Mawkawah Mawthawpdah Road which land was inherited from her mother (L) Belsibon Nongsiej.
3. A portion of this land measuring about 120 x 20 meters was acquired by the respondents from the father of the petitioner (L) Rupring Marwein in the year 1978.
4. The respondent No. 3 vide letter and Memo No.ACQ.A.23/76/200, dated 04.03.2010 issued upon the petitioner's mother has conveyed the intention of the respondents to widen the Nongstoin-Mawthawpdah Road and for a spot enquiry to be conducted on 10.03.2010, which according to the petitioner was done in the presence of the petitioner's mother but no proper measurement of the portion of the petitioner's land was
Chhotanben & Anr. vs. Kiritbhai Jalkrushnabhai Thakkar & Ors: (2018) 6 SCC 422
India Pipe Fitting Co. vs. Fakhruddin M.A. Baker
Mohd. Yunus vs. Mohd. Mustaqim & Ors.: (1983) 4 SCC 556
Parepalli Pallalayya vs. Kasagani Ramulu & Ors : 2000(2) ALD 70
Shyam Sunder Agarwal & Co. vs. Union of India: (1996) 2 SCC 132
State of Jharkhand vs. Surendra Kumar Srivastava & Ors.: (2019) 4 SCC 214
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Limitation Act, specifically Article 58, to determine the limitation period for filing a suit for declaration of right, titl....
A Title Suit filed without jurisdiction cannot lead to valid execution; the doctrine of lis pendens binds subsequent purchasers to existing litigation outcomes.
(1) Striking out pleadings and rejection of plaint – Once specific provision under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC, is available, High Court cannot exercise powers under Article 227 to reject or strike off ....
High Court's jurisdiction under Article 227 is to ensure subordinate courts act within their authority; amendments to pleadings must be sought in good faith and with due diligence.
Civil Law – Decree - A decree is preliminary when further proceedings have to be taken before suit can be completely disposed of. It is final when such adjudication completely disposes of suit - It m....
[The court established that amendments to pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC can be allowed at any stage of the proceedings, provided they do not change the fundamental nature of the suit an....
All amendments necessary for determining the real issue in controversy between the parties must be allowed, and the fact that the amendment may be belated cannot be a ground to disallow the amendment....
The unilateral cancellation of the settlement deed by the parents is illegal and without jurisdiction. The cancellation of settlement deed by the parents is non-est in law. The suit filed in the year....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.