SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Megh) 34

W. DIENGDOH
Pyniarlang Kurkalang – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. C.B. Sawian, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. N.D. Chullai, AAG. with Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. Sr. GA, for the Respondent

Judgement Key Points

The provided legal document discusses a recent judgment from the High Court of Meghalaya that emphasizes the importance of adopting a more lenient and empathetic approach in cases involving adolescents in relationships, particularly under the provisions of the POCSO Act. The court highlighted the need to consider the societal context, the nature of adolescent relationships, and the potential hardship caused by strict enforcement of the law, especially when the relationship is based on mutual love and supported by family.

The judgment underscores that the primary objective of the POCSO Act is to protect victims of child sexual abuse, but it also recognizes that the application of the law should be nuanced, taking into account the circumstances of adolescents who are in consensual relationships and may have entered into marriage or cohabitation with societal acceptance. The court's decision to quash the FIR and proceedings was influenced by these considerations, aiming to preserve family unity and prevent undue hardship on the individuals involved.

Furthermore, the judgment advocates for legislative amendments to better address cases involving adolescents in relationships, reflecting societal changes and needs. It also calls for awareness programs to educate the public about the dangers of underage marriage and cohabitation, aligning legal enforcement with societal realities.

In sum, the judgment exemplifies a judicial approach that balances the strict legal framework of the POCSO Act with the recognition of adolescent agency, societal norms, and the importance of protecting family integrity, thereby promoting a more compassionate application of the law in appropriate cases.


JUDGMENT

1. On 13.07.2021 one WPSI T.M. Sangma of Madanrting P.S had filed an enquiry report to the Officer-in-Charge, Madanrting P.S. wherein, it was reported that on 31.03.2021, a telephonic information was received from Nazareth Hospital, Shillong indicating that one minor girl who is the petitioner No. 2 herein had come to the hospital for medical checkup as she was pregnant. The hospital on finding that the girl was under aged had accordingly informed the police at the Madanrting P.S.

2. On enquiry, it was found that the said minor girl was 17 years and 9 months old as on 30.08.2020 and had accordingly, turned 18 years after 18 days of her pregnancy. The protagonist in this entire episode is said to be the petitioner No. 1.

3. According to the said WPSI T.M. Sangma, the minor girl as well as her mother who have been examined have clearly stated that they do not want to lodge any complaint against the petitioner No. 1 as the petitioner No. 1 and the petitioner No. 2 are staying together as husband and wife. This is also reflected in the statement of the petitioner No. 2 as the alleged victim recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C.

4. On the basis of the said report, the police have regi

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top