IN THE HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
W. Diengdoh, J.
Shri Krishna Kumar Rai - Appellant
Versus
The Union of India - Respondent
BA No. 13 and 14 of 2024
Decided On : 17-05-2024
Bail - NDPS Act - Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C), 23, 29, 37 - The court interpreted the provisions of the NDPS Act, emphasizing the stringent conditions for bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband, requiring reasonable grounds for believing the accused are not guilty.
Fact of the Case:
The case involves the seizure of 149.55 Kg of ganja from a vehicle, leading to the arrest of four accused. The accused claimed ignorance of the contraband, while the prosecution linked them to the main accused through call records.
Finding of the Court:
The court found insufficient evidence to establish the accused's direct involvement in the contraband's transportation and storage, but noted a prima facie connection through call records with the main accused.
Issues: Whether the accused persons could be granted bail under the NDPS Act given the serious nature of the charges and the evidence presented.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, bail can only be granted if there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused are not guilty, which was not established in this case.
Result: Bail petitions dismissed.
COMMON ORDER (ORAL)
W. Diengdoh, J. - These two bail applications have been filed by the same petitioner in respect of two accused persons involved in the same case i.e. Criminal NDPS Case No. 8 of 2023 pending before the Court of the learned Special Judge (NDPS), Nongpoh, Ri-Bhoi District, and as such are taken up by passing a common order.
2. The case relates to seizure of contraband substance made by Customs officials who, on receipt of reliable information had intercepted a Maruti Alto vehicle bearing Registration No. ML05 Q 6794. Following such lead, the said group of Customs officials followed the occupants of the said vehicle No. ML 05Q 6794 and at about 3:00 AM on 24.05.2023, the vehicle was asked to stop but on the said order not being complied with and was speeding away, the officers chased the vehicle and managed to intercepted it at Bhoirymbong market. On checking the vehicle, four persons were found as occupants and on being questioned they agreed to lead the officers to the exact place where they have hidden the contraband substance.
3. On reaching Liarbang Village, the said persons led the officers to a forested area where twenty-four packets of compressed blocks wrapped in brown paper suspected to be ganja were found. On due procedure being followed as far as search and seizure is concerned, the contraband substance was removed from the place it was found to the custody of the Customs officials.
4. The competent authority has then arrested the four occupants of the vehicle namely; Shri Dilu Joy Riang, Shri Sanjib Gohai, Shri Sujit Kumar Rai and Shri Vicky Kumar and investigation was launched thereafter.
5. The Investigating Officer, on completion of his investigation has filed the final complaint before the Court of the learned Special Judge (NDPS), Nongpoh, finding that the accused persons above named are involved in the dealing, storage and transportation of the contraband substance, i.e. cannabis (ganja) weighing about 149.55 Kg. and thereby, have contravened the provisions of section 8 (c) of the NDPS Act by committing an offence punishable under section 20(b)(ii)(C) read with section 23 and 29 of the said NDPS Act. The four accused persons are now undergoing trial before the Trial Court at Nongpoh. It may be mentioned that another person has also been named as one of the accused in this case, whose name is Sankar Saha said to be the mastermind of the whole operation, but who could not be apprehended till date.
6. Mr. S. Pandit, learned counsel for the petitioner while moving this bail application has submitted that the accused person Shri Vicky Kumar is a driver of a Local Taxi bearing registration No. ML 05 Q 6794 and on the date of the incident, he was hired by the two co-accused persons namely Dilu Joy Riang and Sanjib Gohai to drop them to Bhoirymbong. Being night time, he requested his cousin brother Shri Sujit Kumar Rai to accompany him. It was not until the group was intercepted by the Customs officials did the accused persons Vicky Kumar and Sujit Kumar Rai realised that the situation is grave. 7. However, the learned counsel would further submit that there is no iota of evidence to prove that it was the two accused persons in question who have led the police party to the place where the alleged contraband substance was found. There is no report under section 27 of the evidence Act to indicate such fact.
8. The learned counsel has further submitted that even on perusal of the final report, it is seen that there is nothing in evidence to link the two accused persons in question to the transportation and storage of the alleged contraband substance. What has been relied on by the prosecution is that there are call details report (CDR) to link them with the said Sankar Saha. However, from the materials on record nothing has been produced by the Investigating Officer to definitely prove this accusation, except for a bald statement made in the complaint that the accused persons in question are found to be in co
AI
The NDPS Act imposes strict conditions for bail in cases involving commercial quantities of drugs, requiring substantial evidence to prove the accused's innocence.
The court confirmed that under Section 37 NDPS Act, bail can only be granted if there are reasonable grounds for believing the accused is not guilty and unlikely to re-offend.
Bail applications under Section 37 of the NDPS Act require a presumption of innocence, which was not established in this case, leading to the denial of bail.
Point of law: whether there was compliance of the procedure laid down under Section 42 of the NDPS Act or not, could be ascertained at the time of trial.
Bail under the NDPS Act requires substantial evidence indicating the accused is not guilty, prioritizing public safety and the integrity of judicial processes over personal liberty.
The court ruled that in narcotic offenses, knowledge of possession and conscious possession are crucial in determining bail eligibility, with emphasis on the applicant's burden to prove innocence and....
The limitations on the grant of bail for NDPS Act offences and the concept of possession under the Act are crucial in determining the involvement of the accused and the grounds for grant of bail.
The court emphasized that under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, bail cannot be granted unless the twin conditions are satisfied, especially in cases involving large quantities of contraband.
The court emphasized that bail under the NDPS Act requires a high standard of proof of innocence not met by the applicant, leading to dismissal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.