IN THE HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
I.P. MUKERJI, CJ, W. DIENGDOH, J.
Bakul Narzary – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent
PIL No. 7 of 2023, MC (PIL) Nos. 2, 4 of 2024
Decided On : 23-10-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. concerns of animal cruelty and regulation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. pending amendment of livestock rules. (Para 3) |
| 3. disposal of pil with liberty to apply. (Para 4 , 9) |
| 4. court cannot initiate legislation. (Para 5) |
| 5. government action regarding rule finalization. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT :
I.P. MUKERJI, CJ.
1. This public interest litigation (PIL) concerns the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Regulation of Livestock Markets) Rules, 2017 framed thereunder.
2. It is a Central Act. The grievance of the writ petitioner and the applicant in MC (PIL) No.2 of 2024 and MC (PIL) No.4 of 2024, who seeks to be added as a party in the PIL is broadly that the State government which is entrusted with the implementation of the Act and the rules should do so strictly in accordance therewith. The main complaint seems to be approval for setting up these markets and relocation thereof granted by the State government without proper notice to the stakeholders, lack of proper infrastructure facilities in these markets and so on for maintaining them and non-adherence with the requirements of Rule 8 of the said Rules, which prescribes a minimum distance to be maintained from the State border or International border for running these markets.
3. We find from the records that on earlier occasions when these matters were taken up Mr. K. Khan, learned AAG submitted that the said Rules were in the process of amendment. A draft containing proposed amendments was only available and the rules were awaiting finalization. He submits on instructions that the rules are still not finalised but awaiting so. As far as the applicant in MC (PIL) No.2 of 2024 and MC (PIL) No.4 of 2024 is concerned, the persons affected are breeders of livestock not meant for trade in the animal market conceptualized of the said Act and rules but for agricultural utilization only. We find that the applicant has sufficient locus to be interested in this PIL and to espouse the cause of action mentioned therein along with the prayers for specific orders in aid of the PIL for redressal of their grievance.
4. We allow the miscellaneous application (MC (PIL) No.2 of 2024).
5. As far as the cause of action and prayers in the PIL are concerned, this Court cannot direct legislation to be made or initiate legislation itself.
6. We only request the Central Government to finalise the draft Rules as expeditiously as possible preferably not later than 31st December, 2024 and to publish and circulate the same.
7. Till the Rules are published, the Registrar General of this Court will send a copy of the PIL together with MC (PIL) No.4 of 2024 to the State government. The said application shall be considered as a representation before it. This representation must reach the government positively by 12th November, 2024. By 15th December, 2024, the government will take a decision on the complaints made in the writ petition and in the application of the added party in MC (PIL) No.4 of 2024 and communicate the same to the parties. While taking a decision, it will be open to the government to give the petitioner and the applicant a hearing.
8. After amendment of the rules, the applications of the writ petitioner and the added party shall be reconsidered by the government so as to redress of the grievances mentioned therein in accordance with the amended rules within three months of publication thereof.
9. PIL No.7 of 2023, MC (PIL) No.2 of 2024 and MC (PIL) No.4 of 2024 are hereby disposed of. Liberty to apply.
Court cannot compel legislation but can request timely finalization of regulations to address grievances related to the implementation of animal welfare laws.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for strict compliance with the Acts and Rules related to prevention of cruelty to animals, and the importance of regular monitoring and en....
A writ of mandamus cannot be passed without specific instances of rule violations and must be supported by evidence.
Transportation of animals is governed by strict statutory provisions requiring adherence to the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and accompanying regulations to ensure animal welfare.
Judicial intervention requires specific grievances rather than vague allegations to take actionable relief.
Ownership of animals does not guarantee custody if the owner fails to comply with legal requirements for their transport and care, as established under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and re....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.