N. Kotiswar Singh, J.

1. Heard Mr. R.S. Reisang, learned senior PP for the State and Mr. N. Mahendra, learned counsel for the respondents in these two revision petitions.

2. These two revision petitions have been filed by the State being aggrieved by the orders dated 3.9.2014 passed by the Special Court (ND & PS), Manipur at Lamphelpat in Cril. Misc.(B) No. 97 of 2014 and in Cril. Misc. (B) No. 98 of 2014 by which the respondents were granted bail.

These revision petitions are heard together as these arise from the identical impugned orders dated 3.9.2014 relating to the same cause of action and FIR, and disposed of by this common judgment.

3. Before we proceed to examine the correctness of the order releasing the respondents on bail by the learned Special Judge, this Court would like to deal with the preliminary objection raised by the respondents that the present revision petitions preferred by the State are not maintainable. It has been submitted by Mr. Mahendra, learned counsel for the respondents that these revision petitions were filed by the State under Section 397 read with Sec. 439(2) and 401 of Cr.P.C. for setting aside or quashing the orders dated 3.9.2014 passed by