SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Manipur) 24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
M.V. MURALIDARAN, J.
Shri Aheibam Romel Singh - Appellant
Versus
The State of Manipur through the Principal Secretary/Commissioner (SCERT), Govt. of Manipur - Respondent
WP(C) No. 868 of 2019
Decided on : 15-12-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Kh. Tarunkumar, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. K. Jagat, Mr. M. Hemchandra, Sr. Adv., Mr. Juno Rahman S., Advocate

Point of Law: Seniority of a person who is appointed to a post in accordance with Rules by enjoying all the benefits of regular service are entitled to seniority from the date of appointment.

Headnote:

Service Matter - Seniority - Determination of - Petitioner seeking to quash the impugned seniority list - Respondents 1 and 2 to count the seniority of the petitioner with effect from 18.1.2014 for the post of Principal, DIET, SCERT, Manipur i.e. the day of his promotion to the post of Principal, DIET, SCERT.

Finding of the Court:

Eligibility and seniority are not to be mixed up and there should not be any confusion in between the eligibility and seniority-it is clear that nowhere it is mentioned that the seniority for the post of Director, SCERT shall be counted from the date of possessing the eligibility- If the seniority of the petitioner is to be counted from 23.1.2016, it should have been clearly worded in the Recruitment Rules of the Director, SCERT by stating that the seniority of the person holding the post of Principal, DIET shall be counted from the date of giving identical scale of pay of the post of Principal with that of the Joint Director, SCERT. Therefore, the question of giving preference to the date of eligibility against seniority does not arise in the instant case.

Result: Writ petition is allowed

JUDGMENT :

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to quash the impugned seniority list dated 18.9.2019 in respect of the petitioner and the third respondent and to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to count the seniority of the petitioner with effect from 18.1.2014 for the post of Principal, DIET, SCERT, Manipur i.e. the day of his promotion to the post of Principal, DIET, SCERT, Manipur.

2. The case of the petitioner is that earlier he was serving as Lecturer, District Institute of Education Training (DIET) and on the recommendation of the Departmental Promotion Committee, he was promoted to the post of Principal, DIET on 18.1.2014, whereas the third respondent was promoted to the post of Joint Director, State Council of Educational Research and Training (SCERT) on 28.3.2014. Further case of the petitioner is that new Recruitment Rules for the post of Director, SCERT was notified in the official Gazette on 9.11.2016, wherein the post of Principal, DIET, Joint Director (NFE), Joint Director (SCERT) with at least 6 years of regular service in the grade with the qualification of second class Master Degree in any subject of any recognized University are eligible for promotion to the said post of Director, SCERT.

3. According to the petitioner, earlier the scale of pay for the post of Principal, DIET was not identical with the scale of pay for the post of Joint Director and the scale of pay for the post of Principal, DIET became identical with the scale of pay for the post of Joint Director with effect from 23.1.2016. After the publication of new Recruitment Rules for the post of Director, SCERT, a tentative seniority list of Principals, DIET, Joint Director (NFE) and Joint Director, (SCERT) was notified on 14.8.2019 and objections were called for from the concerned persons. In the said tentative list, the name of the petitioner appeared at Serial No.2, whereas the name of the third respondent appeared at Serial No.1. The petitioner submitted an objection to the said tentative seniority list with reasons and requested the authority concerned to place his name at Serial No.1 as he was appointed to the post of Principal, DIET on regular basis on 18.1.2014 in comparing the third respondent as he was appointed to the post of Joint Director, SCERT on 28.3.2014. However, without properly considering the objection of the petitioner, the impugned final seniority list of the aforesaid three posts was notified on 18.9.2019 without any changes. Challenging the same, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.

4. The official respondents 1 and 2 filed affidavit-in-opposition stating that the Recruitment Rules for the post of Director (SCERT), Manipur was published on 7.11.2016 and notified in the Gazette on 9.11.2016 making the posts of Principal, DIET/Joint Director (NFE)/Joint Director (SCERT) having at least 6 years regular service in the Grade with 2nd Class Master’s Degree and B.Ed/PG Diploma in Teaching of any recognized University as feeder posts for promotion to the post of Director (SCERT), Manipur. It is stated that pursuant to the order dated 22.1.2019 passed in W.P.(C) No.936 of 2016 which was filed by the third respondent for amendment of the Recruitment Rules for the post of Director (SCERT), the matter was referred to the Department of Personnel for their clarification and concurrence. The Department of Personnel has informed the Administrative Department of SCERT that no clarification is required as there was no flaw in the existing Recruitment Rules.

5. It is stated that on 14.8.2019, a tentative seniority list of posts feeder to the post of Director, SCERT was notified inviting objections, so that any issue relating to inter-se seniority is settled before the post of Director, SCERT falls vacant. In the tentative seniority list, the third respondent was placed above the petitioner based on the condit

                        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                        1
                        2
                        3
                        4
                        5
                        6
                        7
                        8
                        9
                        10
                        11
                        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                        supreme today icon
                        logo-black

                        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                        Please visit our Training & Support
                        Center or Contact Us for assistance

                        qr

                        Scan Me!

                        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                        whatsapp-icon Back to top