SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Manipur) 223

SANJAY KUMAR
Gegin – Appellant
Versus
Khwairakpam Manglembi Devi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
N. Mahendra, Advocate., for the Petitioner; W. Niranjit, Advocate., for the Respondent No.1

JUDGMENT

1. By Judgment and Order dated 29.06.2019, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Manipur at Lamphelpat, disposed of Motor Accident Claims Case No. 46 of 2017 filed by respondent No.1 herein. Thereby, the Tribunal directed respondent No. 2 in the Claims Case to deposit the compensation amount of Rs. 11,25,182/- (Rupees Eleven Lakh Twenty-Five Thousand One Hundred and Eighty-Two only) along with interest thereon @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization. A copy of the said Judgment and Order was directed to be furnished to respondent No. 2 for information and compliance. Aggrieved thereby, respondent No. 2 filed this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for brevity, 'the Act of 1988'). As there was a delay of 54 days on his part in doing so, he filed MC(Mac App). No. 3 of 2019 seeking condonation thereof. However, when the said miscellaneous case was taken up for hearing on 26.11.2019, Mr. N. Mahendra, learned counsel appearing for the applicant/appellant, made an endorsement to the effect that no application for condonation of delay was necessary and that the miscellaneous case may be closed as withdrawn. Recording the s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top