Back
M. V. MURALIDARAN
Manipur Technical University – Appellant
Versus
Mutum Shaymkesho Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. All these miscellaneous petitions have been filed by the Manipur Technical University to vacate the interim order dated 7.12.2021 passed in the batch of writ petitions.
2. For ready reference, the relevant portion of the order dated 7.12.2021 passed in the batch of writ petitions is reproduced hereunder:
'In compliance with the order dated 03-12-2021, it has been submitted by Mr. T.Momo, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 & 3 that the Manipur Technical University has chosen the second option because of which it is directed that the Manipur Technical University may go ahead with the recruitment process and the result thereof shall not be declared till the next date and the same shall be kept in a sealed cover.
List the matters on 25-01-2022 for disposal in the category of admission in view of the urgency involved in the matter.
Learned counsel for the parties are directed to complete their pleadings by then. It is open to the learned counsel for the parties to make appropriate prayer before the Court on the next date for passing appropriate orders including the one modifying this order. In case these matters are not listed for one reason or another, it is further
The importance of faculty for the university and the interest of the students influenced the court's decision to set aside the interim order and allow the declaration of results for the recruitment p....
The appointment of Vice-Chancellors must comply with statutory provisions and UGC regulations, ensuring lawful and independent decision-making by the Chancellor.
The court established that the Minister's restrictions on the petitioner's powers as Vice-Chancellor were illegal and arbitrary, violating the provisions of the Manipur Technical University Act, 2016....
First choice in Section 13(7) of “Act” is Vice Chancellor of any other University in Kerala; and admittedly, all such persons are fully qualified in terms of both experience and educational qualifica....
The central legal point established is the court's emphasis on preventing academic disruption and the lack of evidence to challenge the eligibility and suitability of the successful candidate.
The UGC Regulations, 2018 prevail over the conflicting provisions of the concerned State Universities Act relating to the appointment of the Vice-Chancellor.
The UGC Regulations allow for the nomination method in appointing a Vice Chancellor, validating appointments even if candidates did not respond to advertisements.
Reappointment of Vice Chancellor without fresh selection is valid unless specified; initial appointment void for UGC non-compliance.
UCG Regulations has not been adopted by State Government and only reference made in respect to selection to post of Vice Chancellor of University is screening of applicants on their eligibility on ba....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
