IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
SANJAY KUMAR, CJ., AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH, J.
Gunabati Kangabam, D/o. (Late) Jayanta Kumar Singh Kangabam – Appellant
Versus
The State of Manipur, through its Addl. Chief Secretary (Fishery), Government of Manipur and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Appeal No.111 Of 2022 With Writ Appeal No.112 Of 2022 And Writ Appeal No.115 Of 2022 With MC(WA) No.202 Of 2022, Ref:-Writ Appeal No.111 Of 2022, With MC(WA) No.9 Of 2023, Ref:-Writ Appeal No.111 Of 2022, With MC(WA) No.10 Of 2023, Ref:-Writ Appeal No.112 Of 2022
Decided On : 03-02-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. regulations governing the promotion process (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. eligibility concerns surrounding specific candidates (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. petitioners' claims for reconsideration of promotions (Para 7 , 11) |
| 4. judicial review of dpc recommendations and subsequent promotions (Para 10 , 12) |
| 5. importance of diploma certification in eligibility (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. court's interpretation of successful course completion despite delayed certifications (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. mandate for review dpc to include eligible candidates for promotion (Para 19 , 20) |
| 8. conclusion and orders issued by the court (Para 21) |
JUDGMENT :
(Sanjay Kumar, C.J.) :
[1] The post of Fishery Officer in the Fisheries Department of the Government of Manipur is governed by the ‘Fishery Department, Manipur (Fishery Officer) Recruitment Rules, 1996’. It is a selection post which is to be filled by promotion of eligible candidates from the feeder categories of Fishery Inspector/Fishery Extension Assistant/ Fishery Instructor/Research Assistant, who possess the prescribed qualifications and experience. Promotion is to be effected upon recommendation by a Class-II Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC). Note 1 appended to the Tabular Statement in the recruitment rules provides that where a person is considered for appointment, all persons possessing the requisite qualification and who are senior to him in the grade shall also be considered irrespective of whether or not they fulfill the requirement as to minimum qualifying service prescribed for the purpose of promotion. Note 2 states that any period of ad-hoc appointment prior to regularization of appointment should not be counted towards the minimum period of service prescribed for promotion.
[2] Office Memorandum dated 15.05.2014 was issued by the Department of Personnel & Administrative Reforms (Personnel Division), Government of Manipur, revising the existing instructions and consolidating the guidelines to be followed by Departmental Promotion Committees (DPCs). Clause 3 of the guidelines provides that DPCs should be convened at regular annual intervals to draw up panels for making promotions against vacancies occurring during the course of the year.
[3] However, no promotions were made to the post of Fishery Officer, be it for whatever reason, during the years 2015-2016 (1 vacancy reserved for ST), 2016-2017 (1 unreserved vacancy), 2018-2019 (1 vacancy reserved for ST) and 2019-2020 (3 unreserved vacancies and 2 vacancies reserved for ST). Thereupon, the Fisheries Department, Government of Manipur, addressed letters dated 05.09.2019, 20.12.2019 and 26.08.2020 to the Manipur Public Service Commission (MPSC) to convene a DPC for making appointments by promotion to these eight vacant posts of Fishery Officer. The Administrative Department is stated to have recommended the names of ten eligible officers who satisfied the prescriptions under the recruitment rules. However, the names and details of these ten officers are not placed on record. As per the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the Secretary, MPSC, Imphal, the Administrative Department submitted the ACRs of only nine Fishery Instructors/Fishery Inspectors, under its letter dated 20.12.2019. Thereafter, one more officer was added and the Administrative Department requested the MPSC to consider their candidatures.
[4] The combined Final Seniority List, as on 31.08.2019, of Fishery Inspectors/ Fishery Instructors/Fishery Extension Assistants was communicated to the MPSC, under the letter dated 04.09.2019 of the Director of Fisheries, Manipur. Therein, Keisham Dineshwar Singh stood at Sl.No.7 and Elangbam Rameshwor Singh stood at Sl.No.8. Lairenlakpam Lindali Chanu stood at Sl.No.13 while Gunabati Kangabam stood at Sl.No.18 and Loveson Golmei stood at Sl. No.34. The Administrative Department furnished Integrity Certificates of only eight out of the ten officers named by it. The MPSC constituted a Class-II DPC that held a meeting on 16.11.2020 and recommended
The eligibility for promotion and consideration in DPCs is determined by the rules prevalent at the time of consideration, and vacancies are not to be filled invariably by the law existing on the dat....
The right to promotion constitutes a fundamental right under Article 16, and arbitrary actions by regulatory bodies that deny such rights are unlawful.
Promotion decisions must consider overall service record and misconduct penalties; seniority alone does not guarantee promotion.
An individual eligible for promotion holds a fundamental right to consideration, and promotion cannot be subsumed by in-charge postings; the court recognized the need for regularization based on elig....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.