SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Manipur) 10

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
Ahanthembimol Singh, J.
Luwangthem Jilla Singh and ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Manipur through the Commissioner of Education (School) and ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No. 919 of 2021, WP(C) No. 45 of 2022, WP(C) No. 130 of 2022
Decided On : 04-10-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. N. Ibotombi, Senior Advocate asstd. by Mr. A. Rommel, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. R.S. Reisang, Senior Advocate asstd. by Ms. Timmiwon Raihing & Mr. A. Vashum, Govt. Advocate

The right to promotion constitutes a fundamental right under Article 16, and arbitrary actions by regulatory bodies that deny such rights are unlawful.

Headnote:(A) Promotion Rules - Notification dated 01-02-2021 - Exemption from consulting MPSC - Promotion to Principal post despite retirement eligibility - DPC proceedings and riders examined for legality. (Para 20)

(B) Constitutional Obligations - Right to promotion as part of fundamental rights under Article 16 - Fair consideration necessary - Denial based on arbitrary actions of the DPC. (Para 20)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners, having served over 30 years as Lecturers and later appointed Vice-Principals, were denied promotion to Principal due to an arbitrary rider placed by the DPC, despite being eligible and the MPSC being non-functional when DPC convened.

Findings of Court:
The DPC's recommendation was arbitrary, and the riders placed were unnecessary per the exemption granted by the Government, leading to a delay that denied petitioners their rights.

Issues: Whether the petitioners can be considered for promotion retrospectively before retirement and the validity of the DPC proceedings and orders post-cancellation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found the DPC's rider arbitrary and noted the fundamental right to promotion, which was violated by the actions of the DPC leading to unfair treatment.

Result: The offending conditions set by the DPC were quashed, and the petitioners were to be appointed as Principals notionally by the end of February 2021 with financial benefits from that promotion.

Table of Content
1. factual background of petitioners' promotion case (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. process for dpc and mpsc consultations (Para 4 , 5 , 7)
3. arguments against the dpc's recommendations (Para 6 , 8 , 10 , 12)
4. court's view on dpc actions and principles of promotion (Para 16 , 20)
5. final order regarding the petitioners' promotion (Para 21)

JUDGMENT :

Ahanthembimol Singh, J.

1. Heard Mr. N. Ibotombi, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. A. Rommel, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Mr. A. Vashum, learned GA appearing for the respondents No. 1 and 2 and Mr. R.S. Reisang, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Timmiwon Raihing, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 3. None appeared for the private respondents, despite service of notice.

As the grievances and reliefs sought for in the present three writ petitions are inter-related, all the three writ petitions were heard jointly and the same are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

2. The brief fact of the present cases is that both the petitioners were initially appointed as Lecturer (Geography) and Lecturer (Statistics) on regular basis in the Government Higher Secondary Schools, Education Department, Government of Manipur by an order dated 26-10-1988. After serving about thirty years as Lecturer of Higher Secondary Schools, both the petitioners were promoted to the post of Vice-Principal of Higher Secondary School on regular basis by an order dated 30-10-2018. The next promotional post from the post of Vice-Principal of Higher Secondary School is the post of Principal, Higher Secondary School. Under the recruitment rules for the post of Principal, Higher Secondary Schools, the method of recruitment is by promotion from amongst the following feeder posts:-

    “Vice-Principal of Higher Secondary Schools possessing B.T./B.Ed./Equivalent Diploma from a recognized University/ Institution with 5 (five) years regular service in the grade;

    Failing which

    “Vice-Principal of Higher Secondary Schools possessing B.T./B.Ed./Equivalent Diploma from a recognized University/ Institution with 7 (seven) years regular service as Vice-Principal and Lecturer put together;

    Failing which

    Lecturer of Higher Secondary Schools possessing 2nd Class Master’s Degree and B.T./B.Ed./Equivalent Diploma from a recognized University/ Institution with 10 (ten) years regular service in the grade, provided that not more than 30% of the vacancies to be filled by promotion from Lecturers shall be from amongst the Lecturers of the erstwhile Government Aided/ Private Higher Secondary Schools who were later absorbed in Government service and the remaining vacancies from amongst the other Lecturers”.

3. The petitioners, having rendered more than 30 years regular service as Lecturer of Higher Secondary Schools and more than seven years regular service as Vice-Principal and Lecturer put together, became eligible for promotion to the post of Principal, Higher Secondary Schools a long time back, however, as the authorities did not hold any DPC in time, the cases of the petitioners for their promotion to the post of Principal, Higher Secondary Schools could not be considered for a long time. The process for holding DPC for appointment by promotion to 23 (twenty three) vacant post of Principal of Higher Secondary Schools was initiated by the authorities with the publication of the Final Seniority List of Vice-Principals of Government Higher Secondary Schools on 14-12-2020. In the said Final Seniority List, the name of the petitioner No. 1 is at Sl. No. 5 and the name of the petitioner No. 2 is at Sl. No. 10 and as such, both of them were within the zone of consideration for promotion against the aforesaid twenty three vacant post of Principal of Higher Secondary Schools.

4. As the post of Principal of Higher Secondary Schools is a Class-I post, consultation with the Manipur Public Service Commission (MPSC) was required as per rules, however, at that relevant point of time, the MPSC remained non

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top