Back
HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
CHINTU WAHENGBAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MANIPUR AND ANOTHER – Respondent
JUDGMENT & ORDER :
A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA, J.
[1] Heard Mr. Th. Khagemba, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned G.A. for the State respondents.
[2] The present writ petition has been filed praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari/mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the respondents to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 07.10.2022 issued by the Police Department Manipur and with a prayer for considering appointment of the petitioner to the post of Asst. Sub-Inspector of Police (Male/Civil) in Police Department Manipur as done in the case of 4 (four) other similarly situated candidate in compliance of the common order dated 16.09.2021 passed by this Court in WP(C) Nos. 300 of 2016 & 660 of 2020. In respect of the petitioner, this Court also passed an order dated 29.09.2022 in WP(C) No. 824 of 2022 for consideration of his representation for appointment as ASI in Manipur Police.
[3] The Director General of Police, Manipur issued a notification dated 24.04.2010 for direct recruitment of 112 post of Assistant Sub- Inspector (ASI) of Police (Male/Civil) and the requisite qualification is PUC or intermediate or equivalent
The main legal point established is that the plea for parity with appointed candidates is not applicable if the petitioner had not been appointed, and the court has the authority to quash an order if....
The court affirmed that statutory compliance is essential for appointments in educational institutions, and the doctrine of negative equality cannot be invoked to claim rights based on prior incorrec....
Deliberate inflation of academic marks in application forms constitutes material misrepresentation, invalidating employment contracts under established legal principles of public trust and recruitmen....
Candidates who fill incorrect marks that disadvantage them should not have their candidature cancelled, while those who gain an advantage through errors may face disqualification.
It is a settled legal proposition that the court should not set aside the order which appears to be illegal, if its effect is to revive another illegal order
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
